I started WW on April 22... a little over a week ago. Previous to that, I was on the Atkins diet for 16 months. I lost 55 lbs on Atkins... really loved it... but experienced a radical stall. So I decided to switch over to WW. Well... I haven't lost an ounce on WW... yet. My question is this: Since we're all different in sex, age, chemistry and history, how is it that WW can assign a point range based on weight only? It's my belief that because of my age and history that my metablolism is pretty much shot... and I feel that I need to eat less than my point range to lose weight. But that notion is met with such panic and outrage. Anybody else with WW experience finding that they really need to eat less to make it work?
Thanks! Carol


I've sort of kicked WW to the curb, as Dr. Phil would say... but, luckily, I haven't gained anything. Pheeew! I will be counting again diligently starting next Monday.

