Because I have entirely too much time on my hands this morning (or maybe because I don't have too much time but am avoiding doing anything productive) I complied the data from this thread into a graph to give us a visual of 3FC:
ETA: Opps, I made a mistake. The knees should be green.
Last edited by Missy Krissy; 05-14-2013 at 12:40 PM.
My back. It's much fattier than the rest of me, I don't get it. Also my calves, they aren't actually that fatty because I have always had large calf muscles but I want to fit in normal knee high boots! It takes me fooooorever to lose in the calves.
#1: My bellybutton. It's got these two little pads of fat above it at each corner, and instead of a pretty O shape, it makes it look like this a horizontally squished peachy ring, and it's SO DEEP. I don't have a double belly crease, but my belly button crease does widen out when I bend over. I know this sounds weird, but the rest of my stomach is slowly shrinking, and I know as my skin loosens, that the droopy belly button situation is only going to get worse. No bikinis for me, I guess.
#2: Lower stomach. I've got a small waist, but it's like I carry this tire across my hips and lower stomach.
@John
Sorry to perplex you but my numbers are accurate. And I did say that the arms were firming up. Not that I need to explain myself to you - but I lift heavy free weights 3x week but have only been doing so for 4 months. I have lost over 100 pounds total so there is a bit of saggy skin that hasn't caught up yet. Frankly, I was insulted and hurt by your comments. So - please don't insinuate that I am being untrue or assume that my stats are incorrect, or need to be 'proven' with pictures.
I apologize I wasn't trying to insult you, at all. I am just curious because it is my nature. If you read my post from a curious professor point of view, only interested in information you might get a different read on it. You certainly don't need to prove anything. It's simply that body fat percentage is quite difficult to accurately measure and you may or may not be off when you think you're at 20%.
It's simply that body fat percentage is quite difficult to accurately measure and you may or may not be off when you think you're at 20%.
Yep, body fat is not easy to measure accurately and most people (and I would say especially most women) greatly underestimate their body fat level. Calipers are not an ideal method for people who have any skin laxity (which is most of us who have lost substantial weight), and bioelectrical impedance can give wildly inaccurate values under some conditions. I've seen women at my gym get their body fat levels estimated at 20-22%, then are later shocked when the DEXA puts them over 30. They're convinced it's wrong because they lift so much... It happens to the best of us.
Because I have entirely too much time on my hands this morning (or maybe because I don't have too much time but am avoiding doing anything productive) I complied the data from this thread into a graph to give us a visual of 3FC:
ETA: Opps, I made a mistake. The knees should be green.
That's awesome! Really cool to "see" it on a graph. Hopefully in a few months that picture can all be green or all nothing!
My back. It's much fattier than the rest of me, I don't get it. Also my calves, they aren't actually that fatty because I have always had large calf muscles but I want to fit in normal knee high boots! It takes me fooooorever to lose in the calves.
I have the same issue w/ my calves. They've always been very muscular, but they are large and if I try to find a tall boot they always end up squished up underneath my calves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Song of Surly
#2: Lower stomach. I've got a small waist, but it's like I carry this tire across my hips and lower stomach.
Yep, body fat is not easy to measure accurately and most people (and I would say especially most women) greatly underestimate their body fat level. Calipers are not an ideal method for people who have any skin laxity (which is most of us who have lost substantial weight), and bioelectrical impedance can give wildly inaccurate values under some conditions. I've seen women at my gym get their body fat levels estimated at 20-22%, then are later shocked when the DEXA puts them over 30. They're convinced it's wrong because they lift so much... It happens to the best of us.
This is exactly why I am content NOT KNOWING. I would go completely insane not knowing which figure was right or have a meltdown from having to accept a larger number.
My "not pregnant enough to look this pregnant" belly, which doubles as a built-in muffin top.
My batwings. I'm nowhere near goal yet but it's pretty obvious they're not going anywhere without surgery. One of my friends calls hers angel wings!
My boobs. There, I said it. They've never been perky (not even at the start of puberty) and they've deflated so much throughout my weight loss that the only thing holding them up is my belly.
My boobs. There, I said it. They've never been perky (not even at the start of puberty) and they've deflated so much throughout my weight loss that the only thing holding them up is my belly.
Ugh...at this point I'm still good w/ my boobs (wish they were perkier, but I'm about to be 37, LOL) but if they shrink much more I'm seriously considering a boob job. I've been a C cup all my life and now I'm a full B, small C. I have nothing against small breasts, but I myself do not want an A cup.
