View Poll Results: How do you feel about private weigh ins?
I Like the Idea! 13 27.08%
I Hate the Idea... 17 35.42%
I Could Care Less... 18 37.50%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2008, 04:59 PM   #16  
Melissa
 
Hun.e.B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 3,125

S/C/G: TBA/TBA/165

Height: 5'7''

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulBliss View Post
Answering 30+ PM's weekly isn't a lot more work in addition to everything else y'all are doing? Darn! Why can't I get people to answer my ONE pm then?
Well we dont gotta answer the PMs all you gotta do is look at it and record the number. Just like we do now only it wouldnt be on a full thread.
Hun.e.B is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:02 PM   #17  
The Dyslexic Typo Queen
 
Diva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,057

S/C/G: 209/155/120

Height: 5'3

Default

Heck, that might make it easier to weed out the drops out too. maybe...I dunno...lol! I like the idea.
Diva is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:31 PM   #18  
PR 1 Mile: 9:44
 
dixied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 1,555

S/C/G: 200.5/160/130

Height: 5'-4"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
Heck, that might make it easier to weed out the drops out too. maybe...I dunno...lol! I like the idea.
hey Roni - I just noticed your signature...500 miles to the beach party? Are ya'll coming down to visit me? I promise not to serve any more cake.
dixied is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:46 PM   #19  
The Dyslexic Typo Queen
 
Diva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,057

S/C/G: 209/155/120

Height: 5'3

Default

But..but...I like cake and it's my B-day in 21 more days!!!!
Diva is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:48 PM   #20  
Accepting who she is
 
onthetee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,585

S/C/G: 173/see ticker/138

Height: 5'5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportmom View Post
that people could see what numbers the other teams have posted and then try to win for their team by posting a less than honest number.
I have been complimented many times on my ability to see how easy it is to break a law, bend the rules, act unethically. It is kind of a gift that I have, and even I did not come up with that!
onthetee is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:58 PM   #21  
Finding My Bliss
 
SoulBliss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2,916

S/C/G: Fit & Fat!

Height: Tall & Strong, Baby!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onthetee View Post
Code:
Originally Posted by sportmom  View Post
that people could see what numbers the other teams have posted and then try to win for their team by posting a less than honest number.
I have been complimented many times on my ability to see how easy it is to break a law, bend the rules, act unethically. It is kind of a gift that I have, and even I did not come up with that!
I really don't think that kind of thing has happened much, if at all. I mean we have people often taking freebies when they know they need it, posting gains honestly even when it is 0.5 a pound or even much bigger gains and so on.

Also, that would take a LOT of people all working in that same dishonest manner to skew the numbers for a team enough to make a win for the team.

Anyway, I would love for Chellez to explain what she meant.
SoulBliss is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:00 PM   #22  
Finding My Bliss
 
SoulBliss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2,916

S/C/G: Fit & Fat!

Height: Tall & Strong, Baby!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hun.e.B View Post
Well we dont gotta answer the PMs all you gotta do is look at it and record the number. Just like we do now only it wouldnt be on a full thread.
Well, it's true, no one HAS to respond to PM's, ever, but I for one would want a response and would ask for one (which could then be ignored, right? ).
SoulBliss is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:01 PM   #23  
One pound at a time!
 
bethbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 728

S/C/G: 264/239/199

Height: 5'6"

Default

I think the numbers should be posted. It provides more accountability...which is the purpose of the game. If someone does not want to post numbers, they can choose to not play.
I want to play in the next round....but I don't know what the point would be in playing if numbers weren't posted because I would not be accountable to post my numbers each week.
Beth
bethbeth is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:05 PM   #24  
One life, live it well
 
Nori71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,052

S/C/G: 304|ticker|160

Height: 5'6½

Default

Yeah, my *starting weight* PM at the beginning of this challenge was missed/failed/bounced (even though it showed as *sent* in my box) and I almost missed the cut off because of that. It could easily happen with weigh ins also I suppose and then people would be eliminated because the PM system failed or bounced their message.
Nori71 is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:50 PM   #25  
Senior Member
 
LondonJulz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,025

S/C/G: 262/see ticker/153

Height: 5'6"

Default

I voted for "liking" the idea. I, too, think it takes the possibility for "fudged" numbers out of the equation. As a leader, I wouldn't mind having all PM's for weigh-ins. It makes me feel special to have PMS.... NO... PM's
LondonJulz is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:54 PM   #26  
Accepting who she is
 
onthetee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,585

S/C/G: 173/see ticker/138

Height: 5'5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulBliss View Post
Anyway, I would love for Chellez to explain what she meant.

Can any of us truly understand Chelle?
onthetee is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 07:06 PM   #27  
Senior Member
 
caitbeans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mechancisburg, PA
Posts: 221

Default

I like posting the numbers, I think it keeps everyone accountable
caitbeans is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 07:17 PM   #28  
Rennie
 
Shy Moment's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,912

S/C/G: 228/Ticker/120

Height: 4 foot 11 inches

Default

I happen to like having to post my numbers. I am accountable that way. I do a ticker change every two weeks when I go to the doc and do my weigh in. This is another way of being accountable. I really don't understand the thoughts of lying or trying to fix weigh ins to make a team win. Are we dealing with children? This is suppose to be about being accountable, being supportive of other people. Not about a certain team doing better than another team. My gosh anytime anyone loses any weight at all I am cheering them on and happy for them.
Shy Moment is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 07:32 PM   #29  
budding cinephile
Thread Starter
 
chellez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 2,276

S/C/G: 225/197.5/150

Height: 5'5 1/2"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bethbeth View Post
I think the numbers should be posted. It provides more accountability...which is the purpose of the game. If someone does not want to post numbers, they can choose to not play.
I want to play in the next round....but I don't know what the point would be in playing if numbers weren't posted because I would not be accountable to post my numbers each week.
Beth
The way I'm reading it I'm thinking that you're misunderstanding. But I could be wrong... it's happened before. Everyone is still just as accountable as before, its just not public.

By having the weigh in's PM'd to team leaders, it only takes away the public display of numbers and helps cut down on potential cheaters.

I know we are all grown ups here and it seems like we shouldn't have to shift things around to make it seem secretive or childish. I'm just trying to protect the integrity of the challenges I run.

Last edited by chellez; 03-25-2008 at 07:33 PM.
chellez is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 07:36 PM   #30  
budding cinephile
Thread Starter
 
chellez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 2,276

S/C/G: 225/197.5/150

Height: 5'5 1/2"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MomTo2SweetPeas View Post
Yeah, my *starting weight* PM at the beginning of this challenge was missed/failed/bounced (even though it showed as *sent* in my box) and I almost missed the cut off because of that. It could easily happen with weigh ins also I suppose and then people would be eliminated because the PM system failed or bounced their message.
I'm trying to remember if my PM box was expanded to the 1000 pm limit before or after the challenge.

I know personally for the Blue Team, if we decide to go with this system, I'm going to have a message prepped and ready to give a reply saying I got the weigh in. That way you know I got it. If you don't get the message before the deadline... I either didn't get it or haven't gotten to my box.

It's not a definite yet... just a thought.
chellez is offline  
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.