Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2012, 01:52 AM   #16  
Embracing the suck
 
JohnP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California - East Bay
Posts: 3,185

S/C/G: 300/234/abs

Height: 6'9"

Default

No matter what the IP diet "educational material" tells you fat loss is an equation of energy. Energy is measured in calories.

On the IP diet you're consuming 700-900 calories a day. As a 5'1" female your energy needs are far less than a 400lb 6'4" male and yet you're consuming the same aproximate number of calories. So of course you're going to be losing fat far slower than someone much larger.

Regardless - as Kaplods pointed out - you're actually losing fat very fat for your size.
JohnP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 05:58 AM   #17  
Senior Member
 
sonyainva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NoVA
Posts: 453

S/C/G: 150/123.4/115

Height: 5'2

Default

Some quit Due to
Slow progress
Never grasping
The fact that
Slow progress


Is

PROGRESS !!!

I was in your boat yesterday feeling down, spend all day getting to a positive place

Every day we are getting closer to goal
sonyainva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 09:25 AM   #18  
started IP oct. 09 2012
 
guil28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Val-des-Monts, Quebec
Posts: 88

S/C/G: 199.8/163/150

Height: 5'4"

Default

Amazing post!!

Thank you for all this information!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaplods View Post
Yes, you're expecting miracles, but that's because we're all taught to expect miracles, and it's getting worse. I think shows like the Biggest Loser and Extreme Makeover weight loss edition contribute to the mythos, because the show not only shows personal trainers scolding, but actually screaming ragefully at contestants for having lost "only" 10 lbs in a week. And the shows present this as something that could be done at home (even if they add in fine print at the beginning and/or end of the show "don't try this at home.")

Sadly, most of us expect miracles, because we have absolutely no idea what normal, reasonable, or rapid wieght loss really looks like, and what we think we know is absolutely WRONG. We all expect a bare minimum of 2 lbs per week, regardless of our starting weight, as if that were the actual average weight loss for most weight loss plans, and it's not. Most people who are trying to lose weight, do not lose 2 lbs a week (and that's people of any starting weight). So 2 lbs a week, or even 1 lb a week (even if you weighed 400 lbs) is not the average weight loss success for anyone. Even half a pound a week is still rapid weight loss, if you measure "rapid" by how many people trying acheive it actually do.

Also, where IP advertises an average weight loss, you have to realize that's not a guarantee of weight loss, and that the actual average is going to be based on many variables including average starting weight, and your starting weight probably is not average. You started in the overweight not obese or morbidly obese range. Most people who resort to PSMF's (very rigidly controlled, lower-end calorie range diets) are morbidly obese. In fact these are the folks these plans are designed for. You're closer to goal than most, so your losses are also going to be smaller - but 1-2% of your total body weight per week is damned fine weight loss for any program.

If you weighed 300 lbs and lost 5 lbs a week, would you feel as cheated?

You're suffering from the misunderstanding that most of us are, and that is that losing 1-2% of body weight per week isn't super-rapid weight loss. It is.

You're not failing, you're succeeding amazingly. What you're experiencing IS RAPID WEIGHT LOSS. In fact, it's phenomenally rapid weight loss. You're losing more than 1% of your body weight per week (almost 2% in some cases).

When I was at near my highest weight and complained to my dr that I "should be able to lose at least 2 lbs per week like a normal person" my doctor scolded me, reminding me that "normal" isn't losing 2 lbs per week. Normal is losing nothing or losing for a week or two and then regaining more than was lost. I was losing only 1 lb a month at the time and even at that, my doctor reminded me that I was doing better than 95% of women of my body weight. I was losing and had been losing consistently for a year by that point. I was a success, not a failure (even though I had many people tell me otherwise).

I've used this simile many times (so bear with me if you've read it before), but weight loss (no matter how you do it) is like running a big city marathon (without understanding the race itself). We assume we're failing, in last place or close to it because we see 1,000 people ahead of us, not seeing the 20,000 behind us.

The numbers are probably more like 20,000,000 - there are 20,000,000 people behind you. You are succeeding, not failing. IP is not failing you.

You're not crazy, lazy, or stupid for having these expectations. You're also not unusual, you've just been sold a bill of goods by society as a whole and the weight loss industry in particular. Do not expect 1% weight loss every week. That isn't realistic or normal, and may not even be possible (at least not without risking your health, and possibly not even then. You could stop eating entirely and still not boost your weight loss much higher. That's just the way it is. It isn't sad, or unfortunate - it's just reality).
guil28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 12:56 PM   #19  
Senior Member
 
mightbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 367

Default

Kaplods....best post ever!!
mightbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 03:36 PM   #20  
Back for a tweak
 
slow2lose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348

S/C/G: 120/115/110

Height: 5'0"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnP View Post
No matter what the IP diet "educational material" tells you fat loss is an equation of energy. Energy is measured in calories.

On the IP diet you're consuming 700-900 calories a day. As a 5'1" female your energy needs are far less than a 400lb 6'4" male and yet you're consuming the same aproximate number of calories. So of course you're going to be losing fat far slower than someone much larger.

Regardless - as Kaplods pointed out - you're actually losing fat very fat for your size.
I've actually been thinking about this and it does seem very odd. Let's say for the sake of argument it's 900 cals - OK for my size that's doable - but will 900 cals a day be enough for a male who just by sheer mass must need more food just to keep the organs functioning properly?? It just seems so low for a man - ESP since most programs seem to offer men more calories than women.

Just something I've wondered about.
slow2lose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How many lb do you lose a month? Slow losers welcome! Esofia Weight Loss Support 43 10-20-2011 12:02 PM
Any slow losers see things pick up? loriab Ideal Protein Diet 26 08-06-2011 01:16 PM
Slow Losers? emily88 Ideal Protein Diet 18 05-11-2011 02:21 PM
Sigh... any other slow losers out there? clarabr Featherweights 17 10-16-2006 06:24 PM
Slow Losers/"Under 20 pounds To Go Club?" Jojo42 South Beach Diet 19 02-02-2005 02:18 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.