Quote:
i realize i'm not 100% sound mentally and i'm surprised not more people have commented on that part, but to clarify, the ones i have in mind are in the 16-19 range, and my version of having a crush has always been more "i think he's a nice guy" than "he's hot and i want to have wild sex with him."
|
Well, I wasn't going to say anything about the mentally well bit because I thought we were just idly chatting about crushing from afar. Like "Ooh, a cute one!" Not actually serious or doing anything about it other than enjoying the eye candy. If that is the case -- carry on. You are fine, enjoy your own thoughts. Nothing wrong with enjoying human beauty.
Now to carry my thoughts out further...
I think if the person is in that teenage bracket, then it's fine to date there.
If not in that age bracket... it gets creepy the father out the age goes. You might let an 18 & 20 slide. But a 16 and 22? A 17 and 30? Ngggh... that starts getting hairy.
And on top of that, the idea that teens are somehow innocent and sweet... not IME. When I was a teen some of the guys already had their smarmy "I'm a sweet lost little boy" schtick together. There are the truly nice guys, of course, but no age group is without its smarmies. One year my locker was over a teen rapist's locker and I refused to use it. I used my friend's or my boyfriends until that guy was kicked out of school!
I have no problems with a May-December thing if both parties are 21+. I just can't see where a May-December thing is cool if the younger party is a teen. That's lopsided.
Quote:
in all the years i've spent on the internet, i've noticed that while a man expressing interest in young girls may raise some eyebrows, there would always be those quick to point out "as long as they don't do anything until she's 18, who cares?"
|
I care!
A thing doesn't have to be sexual to be totally NOT appropriate. Because the older adult should know better and should keep healthy boundaries even if the kid is all over the map, or crushing on the adult, or whatever. The adult should put the kid firmly in place. To allow that sort of thing is blurring boundaries. Even if Adult A means no real harm but still allows too much loosey goosey overfriendly behaviour...
it sets the kid up as even easier prey for Adult B who may actually have predatory intent. The kid doesn't know where the limit is or how to recognize the red flags. Adult A should shape up and be a good role model and put the kid in their place. It isn't being "friendly" to the kid to be all loosey goosey with the boundaries.
We constantly go over this with our church sunday school teachers and youth advisors. Friendly to the kids, but NOT their friend. You are their teacher or advisor, not their pal. Esp the advisors who are often 20's people... the teens want to treat them like cool older pals. And sometimes the job attracts 20's adults who are in arrested development or something who want to prolong their own teenagerdom.
But blurry boundaries between a minor and an adult -- ugh.
A.