With all due respect, the "fiber cap" is a stupid rule, and I refuse to follow it. I'll admit that I "floundered" through the WW program last fall, and didn't make much in the way of serious, consistent results... but in the past 4-5 weeks, I've lost close to 12 pounds, and I've
counted all the fiber I can handle!
I was around in '98 when they first started the points system, and yes, people were getting a little silly with the fiber.
"Look, this can of pork and beans has 13 grams of fiber per serving! If I play with the numbers just right, and combine some numbers, I can eat this entire 32 ounce can for only THREE POINTS!" And that's where people got into trouble, IMHO: They ignored serving sizes, portion sizes. And if you ate that entire can of pork and beans and sat on the couch that night, you probably alienated a few family members, too!
Kellogg's All-Bran was another "issue": People using their little cardboard sliders found that when you loaded in all those fiber grams, the marker was landing closer to 0 than 1... so some reasoned that,
"Well, I guess All-Bran is 'free' and I can eat all I want without counting a single point. I wonder how many other foods I can find like that..."
I have a box of Kashi GoLean here. Label says 120 calories, 1 gram fat, 10 grams fiber. If I "cap" the fiber at 4 grams, I get 2 points per serving; if I count the full 10 grams, I get 1 point per serving.
So... does that also mean that if I whip out the Ben & Jerry's tonight, I get to knock that 15 grams of fat in my 1/4 cup of ice cream down to 5 grams? Or the calories?
Sorry, but if I have to be "honest" about everything else... the fat, the calories
and the portion sizes (arguably the most important aspect of this)... I'm gonna be honest about the fiber, too.
Maybe, just maybe, six months from now the fiber cap won't look that stupid; maybe
I'll be the one looking stupid. But for now, I'm gonna be honest about everything. Portions, points, exercise... everything.
Including fiber.