Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2006, 08:03 AM   #31  
Senior Member
 
Misti in Seattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 8,802

Height: 5'8.5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davinci123
Thanks for the support Misti! I'll let you all know how it goes.
Good! I'll be looking forward to hearing!!! You go!!

I did an extensive study on aspertame and nutrasweet, etc... since then I will hardly touch the stuff!!
Misti in Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 09:58 AM   #32  
I restore Teeth.
 
veggielover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GOTHAM CITY
Posts: 1,194

Default

Misti, I worked in a laboratory (yes, these are where all those scientific studies come from, those publications, those in depth statistics that go into the NYTIMES) and found nothing wrong with aspartame or splenda. This is the only reason why the FDA approves of it. As chemicals, there ARE POTENTIAL reactions due to the properties they exhibit but to say that you stay away from them since you've read articles...... well I'm telling you now that it may or may not be true. As an inspiring statistician, I can tell you that 1 experiment done by 2 different people can very well yield different events. In that case, I can understand your refrain from sweeteners, but seriously-

90.0% cases of all aspartame related side effects are headaches. People DO get cancer whether or not they have sweetener. I don't understand where people get this "IT CAUSES" or "_____ is LINKED with _____" Statistics mean something and nothing at the same time- when a case is in an isolated environment and every factor is controlled, thats only when something can be proven with statistics. BUT WHEN YOU ALL KNOW THAT BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ARE MULTIFACTORIAL AND NON-ISOLATED, how can anything be relevant without it being over 66% in correlation tests??? I'm almost going to give up trying to convince you guys that science isnt always consistent. It's funny, because if I told you that 95% of aspartame cases were headaches but 5% reported they had cancer even if they had genetic history, everyone will have linger in their heads "OH MY GOD!! I MIGHT BE THAT 5%!!!!"

Thats fine. Whatever, I'd rather have my aspartame and not get DIABETES.
(you see, if anyone can use the aspartame-cancer argument, I can use the sugar-diabetes argument. And you know what? SUGAR INTAKE IS correlated with diabetes, unlike the aspartame-cancer . And in BOTH CASES, you must consume a crap load of the chemical to see a side effect- and I guarantee you that you'll have to consume a lottttttt more aspartame to see any effect then consuming a large amount of sugar regularly to get diabetes.)
veggielover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 10:09 AM   #33  
Senior Member
 
KriWes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 132

S/C/G: 165/141/125

Default

Well...I'm one who has flip-flopped on the asparthame issue. I cut it out 100% and after looking into it further I think that it's ok in moderation (like most other things) I certainly don't think you should live on it but occasionally I think that most legitimate research has cleared it. Yes, some people do get headaches etc. directly from asparthame so it's unfair to say there is NO correlation. It's in the same way that I get a sore stomach from drinking milk but not everyone does. Some people have sensitivities to certain foods. I believe it's also being reccomended that pregnant women not consume asparthame as it can be harmful to the baby's development. Well, in my opinion, if a small dose can be bad for a baby obviously I don't want to take it in unlimited qualities.

Not sure if I actually said anything in this post but I just had a few thoughts on it. Anyway, veggie lover weighs 110 pounds so I'm probably pretty likely to do whatever she says will get me down to size 1. (Just kidding...mostly )
KriWes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 10:12 AM   #34  
LLV
Senior Member
 
LLV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3,509

Default

It all boils down to personal choice. If you want to drink it, then drink it. If you don't, then don't.

LLV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 10:16 AM   #35  
Senior Member
 
toofatforu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mississippi
Posts: 1,558

Default

i agree. personally i have to have a glass in the morning to get a boost of energy.
toofatforu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 10:25 AM   #36  
Lifetime Fat Fighter
 
nicolbw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 233

S/C/G: 237/235/150

Height: 5'2"

Default

I love that there are people here who have the same thoughts on this as I do. I don't believe all the hype about sweeteners causing this disease or that disease. I just don't see that anyone has done enough research to prove anything.

I used to drink about 4-5 diet Cokes a day. Then I changed my lifestyle and cut out all drinks except water. I just now, after 17 weeks, have brought back diet sodas. I only drink one can a day. I drink 34 oz of water in the morning. I then drink my one can of soda. Then I drink another 34 oz of water the rest of the day. Some days I may want my soda with dinner, then I'll drink my 68 oz of water before dinner. I don't have any problems, no headaches, etc.

There are alot of different cancers out there. Some are genetic, some are caused by viruses, and some are caused by unknown things. I had HPV about 4 years ago. That caused me to get early stages of cervical cancer. I do NOT blame this on what I ate or drank. It's caused by a virus. I'm doing really well now with it. On a side note: I do highly recommed getting pap smears every year since that is the only way to know if you have HPV. Sorry about the tangent... I just had to say it.
nicolbw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 10:25 AM   #37  
Working on Hot!
 
la3y_un1c0rn_37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,233

S/C/G: 242/225/175

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LLV
It all boils down to personal choice. If you want to drink it, then drink it. If you don't, then don't.

<<<<raises her diet Dr Pepper and says "Here! Here!"
la3y_un1c0rn_37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 11:54 AM   #38  
Senior Member
 
VelVeeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 315

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LLV
Aspartame has been around longer than splenda and recent studies show there's no link between aspartame and cancer risk. However, splenda (sucralose) is fairly new and has had some concerns raised about it.
I agree, I've never had an issue with it either.
VelVeeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 03:49 PM   #39  
~sexy chicka~
 
Cardiomonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central New York
Posts: 206

S/C/G: 265/185/165 5'5"

Default

I was one of the biggest soda fiends in history - Mountain Dew all the way baby. I probably drank 1 1/2 Liters by myself.

When I switched off soda, I went to Propel Flavored Fitness Water (grape or black cherry).

WAYYYY few calories than soda, and no caffeine or carbonation. It has some nutrients (or so it says) - I just loved the taste. Eventually switched to plain water to save money - also, I felt ready to.

Now I have a sip of DH's soda once every 3 months or so - and don't even like it.

It helped lose weight, feel better and look better - also, way less heartburn.
Cardiomonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 10:36 PM   #40  
Junior Member
 
JeremiahB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11

S/C/G: 230/229/180

Default

I'm addicted to caffiene and soda is my favorite way to get it. I haven't had any soda for almost a week. It's hard because it's too hot to drink coffee right now for most of the day. I love "energy" drinks too. There was a 12 pack of Vault on sale at Target the other day, it was so hard not to buy it. It was a really good deal.
Giving up soda and "energy" drinks is going to be the hardest part of my new healthier life style.
JeremiahB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 10:45 PM   #41  
Senior Member
 
Misti in Seattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 8,802

Height: 5'8.5"

Default

It was hard for me too Jeremiah but soooooo worth it!! One of the best things I ever did healthwise. And saves a lot of $$$ too LOL
Misti in Seattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.