I'd be super careful on appearances, though.
I didn't find my husband particularly attractive when I first met him, barely even noticed him and he wasn't my type. And yet he is the single most incredible, intelligent, caring, devoted, competent, strong man I have ever had the fortune of knowing, and even more pleasure in having him be mine.
If I had stuck with my first impressions, sexual attraction, and 'type' (which, I might add, had not served me well in the past as evidenced by my singleness and bitterness toward guys, as a whole, by that point in time) I would have missed what has been the greatest boon and blessing in my life short of being saved (which, none-too-coincidentally, my aforementioned husband has also been an amazing help with). All the things that make him a phenomenal partner and desirable, capable husband were things it took me SIX MONTHS of regular, brief social contact to even glimpse. A picture, blurb, and email cannot do the scope or an individual justice, and choosing partners on the basis of sexual attraction is one of the reasons I think divorce is so darn prevalent. Top much focus on superficial and transient commendations, and not enough compatibility, exploration, or even bare emphasis on the character qualities and values that are the true cement of a lifelong partnership.
If I did what this guy did, I'd have robbed myself of the best adventure of my life (which has become deeper and more incredible every passing year). As long as the individual in question isn't completely repelling in some key way, I am of the mind that a meeting or three where things are discussed in depth is really to everyone's benefit. You can ascertain very little of value without extensive conversation and some quality facetime, when it comes to picking mates.
Off the soapbox, now
