Quote:
Fat loss is always a function of calories. IP provides some horrific "education" in this regard.
As to your original question, if you follow the program you'll be in the 220 range before July, potentially much sooner. The key is following the program.
Originally Posted by JohnP
Fat loss is always a function of calories. IP provides some horrific "education" in this regard.
As to your original question, if you follow the program you'll be in the 220 range before July, potentially much sooner. The key is following the program.
******************
Many of us on here take exception to John's consistent simplification of this. If it was merely related to calories...weight watchers and about 5K in personal trainers over a number of years would have worked for me...and also some others. I actually have to say this: I sometimes wonder due to John's ardor in discounting the carb factor, if/WHY he has a stake in getting some folks off IP! He is as bad as the IP sales force...but at the opposite end of the spectrum. I'm not sure why he feels the need to get on this support forum and stir the pot. Very few here are on their first serious attempt to lose weight. With or without a coach. A coach/accountability is also not a key factor for everyone.
You will have to find what works for you. Carbs ABSOLUTELY matter to some of us. This is an IP forum and we should not have to defend that this is what we have chosen. There are a lot of lo cal forums where folks would embrace his take on weight loss and experience. And I am not saying what he has to offer is not of value in the right context.
1.YES.. it's expensive.
2.NO ..his take is not 100%
3. And most importantly...It's MY nickle and I have had a different experience across the board with losing weight than what I see him recounting.
It is always prudent to be as educated as is possible on what you are doing to your body. Decisions need to be balanced with your own medical team, personal metabolism and previous experiences. If it was as simple as the literature supporting "thermodynamics" there would not be the obesity problem in this country we see. It is not that easy. Horrific education...?? well..there is still a lot to be learned on WHY this works for some when nothing else does. People thought the world was flat for a heck of a long time. In the next generation there will be more knowledge, and better evaluative tools available. Many things we do not totally understand now will be explained better. Right answer...but faulty problem solving pathways are not new or rare in science. That's progress.
Weight loss a function of calorie uptake only for everyone?? Not in my life. Maybe his.
Because of this, I would never say carbs affect everyone the same way they do me. Therefore, it's not fair for John to assume what he has read and his experience covers mine, and most who are successful on this forum. I don't expect to need to defend the value of a lo carb metabolic influence on this forum. Also, I do not discount the value of a low calorie diet at all. It does work, but not for everyone. Calorie deficit is only a piece for some and no where near enough for me to have lost over 70 pounds (38.9% of my body mass to be exact) in less than the last year. I and the rest of us who are JUST as ardent about this, offer our experience to those who have already tried the mainstream stuff you can easily find written up and supported (in spite of the fact there is a high failure rate) ...and were/are still looking for something that works.


I love cooked onions but they are worth not eating (raw yes) on PH1. HTH