Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2014, 02:14 PM   #1  
There is no try.
Thread Starter
Vex's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,274

S/C/G: 281/T/140

Height: 5'6"

Default Are apps reliable in regards to exercise calories burned?

Exercise is a relatively new thing for me. I started walking and fencing back in August and I'm not really seeing the impact I had hoped for.

I use myFitnessPal and MapMyWalk to track my walking. Has anyone experienced the calorie lost aspects of these apps to be accurate?

For example, at a leisurely pace, a 2.32 mile walk over 45 minutes for me is calculated out to be 264 calories. (yeah i know i'm slow)

That seems pretty high to me as I know exercise doesn't usually burn as much as we think it does. Do you think these apps are overestimating calories?
Vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 02:41 PM   #2  
Senior Member
yoyoma's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 1,877

S/C/G: 180/ticker/129 or so =)

Height: 5'6.5"


Yes, many people find that they cannot rely on the apps (or charts) for exercise calories. Most people focus on diet for losing weight and exercise for toning, health, strength, and feeling good. Exercise is also associated with a higher likelihood of maintaining weight loss.

For losing weight, some people do track their supposed calories burned and "eat them back." Some people eat back a portion of them, and others just view the extra calories burned as (negative) gravy. You have to figure out what will work for you, to keep yourself on track to lose weight, stay motivated and energized, and meet your priorities.
yoyoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 03:03 PM   #3  
Munchy's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,202

S/C/G: 133.4/123.2/115


I don't know, so I don't really try to change my eating based on calories burned.

A lot of people buy fitbits to track their calories burned.
Munchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 03:10 PM   #4  
Call me NNS!
nonameslob's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,569

S/C/G: 232.6/169.4/149

Height: 5'5"


Without a heart rate monitor, it's definitely inaccurate. Even still, I wouldn't use calories burned as a way to try to predict how much weight you will lose, nor would I use it to gauge how much you should be eating.
nonameslob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 04:43 PM   #5  
Warrior Princess
novangel's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,244

S/C/G: 155+/Fluffy/Not Fluffy

Height: 5' 5"


I don't take into account any cals burned because really there's no way to know for sure. I just kind of watch what I eat and run as much as possible, so far that has worked for me to keep the weight off.

Somebody that's new to this will need to count calories in carefully.
novangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 04:53 PM   #6  
berryblondeboys's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,367

Height: 5'6.5"


They are notoriously wrong and I wouldn't eat back the calories they say you "can". Now, if you're hungrier, of course, eat a bit more, but not all that they say.

For me, I just use exercise calories as bonus calories burned for the day not as a reason to be able to eat more. It helps that exercise is an appetite suppressant for me.
berryblondeboys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 05:32 PM   #7  
Senior Member
Palestrina's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,607

S/C/G: 215/188/150

Height: 5'4"


No, I don't trust them. I just like to make the number go as high as possible
Palestrina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 06:13 PM   #8  
Senior Member
Dottington's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 1,620

S/C/G: 200/133.4/125

Height: 5'6


I ignore them and just stick to TDEE method and eat roughly the same everyday but do bump it up on hiking days. Hiking is actually weird though bc often the calorie counts are more accurate, and maybe even a little low. I suspect though that's bc what I consider "hiking" is more mountain climbing or borderline trail running to others. Like others above I say ignore the calories burned and pick a number and if you're still hungry eat some more

Last edited by Dottington; 05-30-2014 at 06:25 PM.
Dottington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2014, 11:53 PM   #9  
Less of a Better Me
Koshka's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,405

S/C/G: 207.4/ticker/146

Height: 5'4"


I find that I get the most accurate information (although still imperfect) using a heart rate monitor when I walk or or do other exercise. I use a heart rate monitor that talks to Digifit which then talks to Fitbit to tell it what I burned while using my HRM.
Koshka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2014, 03:16 AM   #10  
Embracing the suck
JohnP's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California - East Bay
Posts: 3,185

S/C/G: 300/234/abs

Height: 6'9"


Originally Posted by Vex View Post
Exercise is a relatively new thing for me. I started walking and fencing back in August and I'm not really seeing the impact I had hoped for.
Exercise doesn't burn that many calories unless it is intense and/or sustained. Don't stop exercising though it is fantastic for your health and body composition.

If budget allows it I would suggest a calorie/activity tracker. Something like the fitbit because after wearing a bodybugg I discovered that formulas don't apply to everyone and small movements over the course of a day add up to quite a few calories.
JohnP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2014, 04:11 AM   #11  
On a break with Baby #5
Arctic Mama's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,754

S/C/G: 257 /ticker/ 160

Height: 5'3" - I got taller!


I haven't found trackers to be accurate, we each have different levels of cardiovascular fitness, differing muscle mass (even at the same weight and height). My general rule is that I allow another protein serving if my workout increases my hunger. When I'm otherwise on plan and on target with my food it doesn't slow the scale at all. But adding slightly more protein is a lot more reliable than tryi to gauge how much I should be adding or subtracting with activity. I don't play the number game if I can help it, and just logging my food and measuring quantities is quite helpful enough. Activity is a pleasant bonus unrelated to weight loss in practice, for me.

So long story short, I do track food (on Loseit) but not activity (pointless).
Arctic Mama is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.