I agree that bowling is being active (relative to sitting on one's duff), but I'd be skeptical about 245 calories per hour. A calorie estimator I saw put snow-shoveling at 290 calories per hour, and there's no way that bowling burns nearly as many calories as snow-shoveling!
Of course, it could be that the shoveling estimate is too low, and I've seen higher estimates. This brings up another point, though, namely that the on-line caloric estimators of activity should be taken with a big old grain of salt. This makes sense: not many agencies or organizations are going to fund a systematic study of bowlers' caloric expenditure, given it has little bearing on either public health or corporate profits.
//b. strong
Kim
|