3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community  

Go Back   3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community > Fitness > Exercise!

Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

Strength and fat storage

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2011, 09:57 AM   #1
June
 
runningfromfat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,620

S/C/G: 240/184/155

Height: 5'6"

Default Strength and fat storage

Now that I've been lifting more I've noticed something strange. It seems wherever I store fat more I have more strength. So I carry a lot of fat in my:
belly (abs), underarms (triceps), back of thighs (hamstrings), chest

and those are by far my strongest muscle groups. On the other hand, my muscle groups that certainly look more defined and carry less weight:
biceps, shoulders, back, calfs

just aren't nearly as strong and it takes A LOT of effort for me to do even light weights on those areas.

I don't get it... my shoulders/back look GREAT but I can barely lift anything on them? However, I have a horrible, horrible belly pouch and serious thunder thighs but I could do sit-ups/squats (with weights) all day.

Anybody else experience the same thing? When I lift I mostly do dynamical lifting i.e. no rest in between sets and I try and do my upper body and lower body at the same time (e.g. bicep curls and squats together) so I just can't figure out why it's so disproportionate? For cardio I alternate between swimming and biking so even with that I'm switching things up a lot.
__________________

Starting Measurements (B/W/H): about 51/40/46, 240 lbs Goal Reached Pre-Pregnancy: 39/29.5/38, 156lbs Current: about 43/34/42
Mini-Goals
Started at 240
Onederland 199 (Jan 6, 2010, exactly 2 years after my previous due date!)
Overweight BMI 185 (Aug 3, 2011, one year after joining 3FC!)
Pre-pregnancy weight 175 (Oct 18, 2011)
Called Goal 156

My Bras, Fashion, and Weight Loss Blog
runningfromfat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 11:43 AM   #2
Hug a Tree!
 
LandonsBaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,302

S/C/G: 145/145/130

Height: 4'9"

Default

I'm not sure I understand the question?. Having less fat in one area doesn't mean you should have stronger muscles in that area.
LandonsBaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 12:10 PM   #3
June
 
runningfromfat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,620

S/C/G: 240/184/155

Height: 5'6"

Default

Basically it's this. Wherever I store a lot of fat I appear to be stronger than where I'm not storing a lot of fat. I'm just curious why there seems to be this correlation? Is there any reason that I'm experiencing this?
__________________

Starting Measurements (B/W/H): about 51/40/46, 240 lbs Goal Reached Pre-Pregnancy: 39/29.5/38, 156lbs Current: about 43/34/42
Mini-Goals
Started at 240
Onederland 199 (Jan 6, 2010, exactly 2 years after my previous due date!)
Overweight BMI 185 (Aug 3, 2011, one year after joining 3FC!)
Pre-pregnancy weight 175 (Oct 18, 2011)
Called Goal 156

My Bras, Fashion, and Weight Loss Blog
runningfromfat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 01:29 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
goodforme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lexington, South Carolina
Posts: 1,510

S/C/G: 242.5/193.4/170

Height: 5'9"

Default

Women store fat in their midsections, thighs, butts. Those also happen to be the largest muscle groups. Your core and legs carry you around all day. Your upper back and arms, probably a lot weaker in comparison. My chest and shoulders and upper back are very weak, I have bad posture and find it hard to stand up straight. My legs are very strong, too strong, in comparison.

Doing weighted sit ups sounds very painful to me! Can you do planks? Epic fail for me! I have a large muscle in my arm, under the fat, but I can only lift about 15 pounds with it, because the shoulder and chest and back muscles that help the arm lift are very weak.

And as previously discussed, my rear muscles (hams/glutes) are much weaker than my front muscles (quads) although I feel like the front of my thigh is much looser and fatter than the back of it.

The areas that carry less fat and look more defined might be just as strong as the other areas, where your strong muscles are still hiding under a layer of fat. Give it time, that will melt right off of you!
__________________
Sherrie
267: Highest known weight
242.5: Weight on dd's 1st birthday
213: Weight on day I delivered dd (Whooshed past on 7/6/10)
200: Weight on day I went home from hospital after delivering dd (MET!! 1/24/11)
180: Lowest weight ever as an adult
170: Initial goal weight (subject to change)
goodforme is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Posts by members, moderators and admins are not considered medical advice
and no guarantee is made against accuracy.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
300+ And Ready To Try Again Weekly Thread #1098 AmmiUK 300+ Club 172 03-26-2007 07:47 AM
Calcium and Fat Loss lessofsarahtolove 100 lb. Club 14 09-12-2005 09:17 AM
300+ and Ready to Try Again ... #586 2cute2Bfat 300+ Club 29 10-29-2004 01:13 AM
Exercise, Diet and Support #5 cyan Support Groups 189 11-14-2003 08:41 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 AM.






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2