View Single Post
Old 02-06-2014, 03:45 PM   #67
grinchygirl
Member
 
grinchygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 76

Height: 5'6"

Default

I think Rachel is a perfect example of the dangers of number focused transformations. The biggest loser competition is about % lost. Not fat % or muscle tone. Not health or overall lifestyle change.

I can't say whether she is healthy or not, because I don't know what she's doing. I don't know if she's starving herself. I feel just as bad saying she's too thin, as I do telling an overweight person they are too fat.

I wish her the best, and hope that if she is experiencing disordered eating or has developed a psychological condition that she gets help and deals with it. Overall, she's in a much better place than where she started.

I'm a fan of curves. I don't tend to find women beautiful who are underweight/borderline, because I think curves look healthy. Muscle mass looks healthy and sexy. I personally, feel she would rock a weight around 120/125.
__________________

Goal List for Spring 2014
-Hit Onederland 1/31/14
-No Longer Obese (185) 3/27/14
-Under 170 by Summer's End
-Healthy BMI (155)
-Goal Weight (143??)
grinchygirl is offline   Reply With Quote