I had done one of these years ago, but had to update it.

Here's my model:
http://www.techtrek.com/Hold/AlmostH...l%20Before.jpghttp://www.techtrek.com/Hold/AlmostH...odel%20Now.jpg

And here's me:
http://www.techtrek.com/Hold/AlmostH...0&%20After.jpg

I haven't lost all the baby weight yet. I was 140 in that real after picture and 145 on the model currently.

That site will let you go up to 310 pounds. I was between 250 and 260 there. But the model, at 250, looks nothing like my shape. I was much larger looking. I tried the model at 310 and the size/shape of it doesn't change at all from 250. They need to tweek their program.

Holy Toledo, what an eye-opener! Looks quite a bit like me, too. :D

http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p...reandafter.jpg

This is me, going from 238 to 140.

My turn! The before doesn't look a lot like me. I think I have bigger hips (43" - that model's is probably much less).
http://home.mvm.com/compositor?v=4&i...75F60648C816BA ~165 http://home.mvm.com/compositor?v=4&i...46FE001004E369 ~130

Hmmm...I agree with the others that they need to tweak their program. I'm not seeing much of a difference here.

Tisha--- oh, I'm sorry if I came off as an *** in that post, no need to thank, it is a public site and I learned of it from someone here a year or so ago! :)
So, we are just passing the news along lol. :)

As for it looking like me: well, I actually have tiny boobs (so, I am actually getting a bigger boob job--and lift!). And also, when I was bigger I had a double tummy and that unsightliness is not there.

Actually, overall, that is one tight and firm heavier model!! She has nice upper arms a big--but flat--tummy and great skin......no flab in sight! I wish, lol.

I never really have a good perception of my size, so I really like sites like this.

And all I have to say is... HOLY CRAP!! I knew I was fat, but wow. That was quite the eye-opener, and probably just the motivation I needed :) Just before the most challenging day of the year, diet-wise! Should be interesting. Thanks for the link!

My "before" VM is missing her double spare tires and the "current" one is missing her deflated double spare tires. And they're both missing my hunk of fat that sits on top of my butt and the new VM is missing the 6 inches of hanging arm skin! I'm not going to post them, because neither of them look anything like my body. But if I get extensive reconstructive surgery (which I plan to do), I CAN look more like the VM!! :carrot:

Hm. It begins to sound like "virtual" models aren't any better representation of actual everyday women than real, live ones are! :lol:

Here is mine! :smug: 240 - 150, I even did one with an outfit on.

http://www.lipstick-kiss.net/virtualmodel2.jpg

Hmm...there seems to be a glitch. Out of curiosity, I put in the highest weight allowable--I think it's 310? And there's not a lick of difference according to that site, between how I would have looked then, and how I would've looked at 250. I don't know if there's just a limit to how many times you can change the number and have it regenerate the graphic, or if there's a problem with my using Firefox instead of IE, but it was a little weird. I'm pretty sure 60 pounds would make at least some difference. *scratches head*

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1.../mvm241106.gif

Here are mine :)

No, you are absolutely right, there is no difference. I don't get it either. I really don't know what that is all about. :shrug:

You should try a model at 4' 10" or less and 310 pounds. She looks just like a 5' 4", 250 pound model. They REALLY need to work on that.

Darn it. The page is not working for me. Everytime I try to "create" my model, I get nothing but those little red x marks & broken squares where a pic ought to be. It won't even let me sign in or anything. Waaaaahhhh.