Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2006, 09:38 AM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Optical Goddess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Schaumburg, Illinois
Posts: 605

S/C/G: 220/194/150

Height: 5'7

Default Fitday calorie allotment

I've decided to start using fitday for my calorie counting. However, it says that with out exersize I will hav burned 2191 calories , 1511 of which is basal. This seems way high for me. I'm five seven and weigh 155 I'm 28, and my job is mainly seated.

Should I just roll with it? I know that there is no huge science to how many calories I need and ho many I need to lose, but this _does_ seem really high for me.

What has anyone elses' experience been? I'm sure it's just me since fit day is wildly popular.

Sometimes I think we should have an ongoing fit day thread, so in case I'm asking questions that have already been asked.

thanks,

og
Optical Goddess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 10:37 AM   #2  
Eating for two!
 
jillybean720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 6,018

S/C/G: 324 highest known/on hold/150

Height: 5' 5"

Default

This question has come up many times, and the general consensus seems to be that yes, Fitday's calories burned are quite high. From what I gather, most people have better luck with setting their activity level to "sedentary" and only adding in intentional exercise. Also, if you add sleep as an activity for however many hours you sleep each night, it will decrease your calories, which I think is more accurate. Good luck!
jillybean720 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 10:41 AM   #3  
Senior Member
 
srmb60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario's West Coast
Posts: 13,969

S/C/G: 165/147/128

Height: 5'3"

Default

Yup, what Jilly said. I have mine set at 'bedridden' I think it's called.
srmb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 03:18 PM   #4  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,862

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

That was my experience, too. It gave me way too high a number for my personal metabolism. I didn't gain weight, but I didn't lose either, until I figured it out.

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 09:12 AM   #5  
Member
 
EverHopeful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 45

S/C/G: 192/186/155

Height: 5'9"

Default

I have found it to be remarkably accurate for me. However, I do NOT add extra activities, like housekeeping, mowing lawn, etc. to my daily activities chart. Unless I do a high intensity workout (which I normally don't do) I leave the numbers as is. I have an excel spreadsheet that I input calories burned vs. eaten and divide the total number by 3500 to see the total pounds I should have lost based on the math. The scales are usually right with this number. It may take a couple of days to catch due to water retention, etc., but every week or so they should be saying the same thing. If they are not, I know that I am either not reporting my food correctly, missing some food that I actually ate, or over reporting "extra" activities. My overall experience though, is it is very accurate.
EverHopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.