Article on REAL fat loss...

You're on Page 4 of 4
Go to
  • Quote: I don't get it when I read that people ate 1800 calories for the day, calculated that they burned 2200 calories through exercise, and so wound up with a calorie deficit of -400 for the day.
    Maybe the 2,200 represents the total energy expenditure: BMR + NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis) + TEF (thermic effect of food) + exercise.

    F.
  • Quote: AprilSnow I wholeheartedly agree that macronutrient ratios change the game drastically, but for many on this forum, worrying about macronutrients ahead of overall calories is getting them into trouble.

    The article is meant for more of the weight-loss 'every man' so to speak.
    Certainly. KISS, right? I lost the first fifty pounds with a bunch of cheats and JUST calorie counting. I didn't focus on my macros or even my body's feedback, and lost just fine. Tweaking prematurely might have just driven me crazy unnecessarily. Beyond that I was fighting my endocrine system with hypoglycemia, the physiological push to regain homeostasis at my prior weight, and autoimmune symptoms that hadn't cleared up. That necessitated being more careful with my food.

    But while I certainly believe certain diets are far more healthful than others, or easier to manage and live on than others, in the end energy balance DOES matter. And for a good handful of dieters, it is the only part of the equation they need to concern themselves with to gain the biggest leaps in losses and energy. Fine tuning is something of a maintenance/perfecting game, not one needed for basic restructuring of food consumption
  • Quote: Maybe the 2,200 represents the total energy expenditure: BMR + NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis) + TEF (thermic effect of food) + exercise.

    F.
    What about SPA?
  • I could definitely use more SPA in my life... and I wouldn't mind going to a spa either come to think of it...
  • LOVE LOVE LOVE THIS! This should definitely be a sticky, it's all about science and physics, and that's not my inner nerd coming out...
  • Quote: Certainly. KISS, right?
    Exactly - at least at the onslaught! (KISS = Keep It Simple, Stupid)

    Quote: Fine tuning is something of a maintenance/perfecting game, not one needed for basic restructuring of food consumption
    Definitely. Sometimes getting people to realize the difference is a exercise in futility. Some people CANNOT be convinced that macronutrient ratios or food quality play a part, while others swear up and down that macronutrient ratios are the ONLY thing that matters. Why is it so hard to imagine that it really is BOTH, but that the degree that each plays a role varies?