Quote:
I have NEVER seen that advice before. Yeah, the math may make sense to a point...but...hmmm...
You can get a lot of really good, nutrient dense food into 2000 calories. (Just pulled a number out of the hat there...)
10-12 x body weight for fat loss is the standard formula used in fitness/figure/body building, based upon slower fat loss for muscle preservation. It's a common formula used in magazines such as Oxygen or Muscle & Fitness Hers. Now, most women using those formulas and looking to lose fat while preserving all muscle mass don't weigh around 300lbs ~ maybe they are around 150lbs. For them, that would be 1500-1800 calories, which is a less shocking number for people to see. But OP is not 150lbs, she is 300lbs, so the number goes up.Originally Posted by Eliana
Heidi, honestly I think I would do a little research on the 3000 calorie suggestion.
I have NEVER seen that advice before. Yeah, the math may make sense to a point...but...hmmm...You can get a lot of really good, nutrient dense food into 2000 calories. (Just pulled a number out of the hat there...)
I know it can seem like a huge number to the average person, but slow dieting while preserving muscle mass may be preferable to faster dieting with a more substantial muscle loss. Either way, numbers are not set in stone. That's for OP to decide.
I generally go by this guide from Emma-Leigh, who is a doctor that specializes in nutrition:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...hp?t=121703921
But you are right that the OP should research the suggestion. Anyone should research before making such dramatic lifestyle changes. I promise my own suggestion is based off years of my own research (including into the credentials of the person whose link I posted to). A suggestion is just that, a suggestion.

