Quote:
Originally Posted by jendiet
well since there is like little to none fat on my lower legs (my calves are 15 inches in circumference). 5 lbs each on my hips, 10 lbs across my abdomen, 5 lbs across my back. 5 lbs across my butt, and another 10 lbs elsewhere--I would say 43 lbs of fat is right compared to 66--that is actually ridiculous. Now that I think of it.
If you were currently carrying only 43 pounds of fat at a total weight of 185, your "0%" body fat weight would be 142 pounds. That would make your 135 goal weight very difficult to achieve.
If you are carrying closer to 66 pounds of fat, you would weigh 119 if you lost it all. At your goal weight of 135 you would be carrying 16 pounds of fat and would have a body fat percentage of about 12%.
Of course, we all know that it isn't QUITE this cut and dried, but it's certainly some "food for thought!"
Personally I'd rather have a high body fat right now! (Which I do!) That way there's more to lose!
