Weight Loss News Archive Older articles

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2000, 08:44 PM   #1  
Cowboy Up Chick
Thread Starter
 
Kelly_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,796

Default

Metabolism not to blame for weight regain, study says
By Anne Burke; HEALTHSCOUT.COM; Tucson, Arizona Sunday, 19 November 2000

If you're a dieter who likes to play the blame game, stand by for some bad news:

It's not your metabolism that causes you to regain lost pounds, claims a new study.

This idea - known as the set-point theory - has become a favorite explanation for many dieters searching for something to blame for their gaining back weight they'd lost.

But the theory was never true to begin with, the researchers say.

Still, there's a bright side.

"Our findings should be seen as good news in that they suggest that we are not destined to regain lost weight due to some internal, uncontrollable metabolic factors," says Dr. Roland Weinsier, director of the Clinical Nutrition Research Center at the University of Alabama.

Lower metabolic rate

According to the set-point theory, we're doomed to regain lost weight. That's because our body lowers our metabolic rate after we shed pounds, pushing our weight back up to its pre-diet level.

But researchers found no difference in the resting metabolic rates of overweight women before and after they lost weight.

Our metabolic rate is the number of calories we burn at rest.

Moreover, the metabolic rates of the overweight women were identical to those of women who had never been overweight and had no tendency to put on weight, the researchers say. The findings appear in the November issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

The study followed 24 overweight, postmenopausal women for four years.

Average weight loss

The women lost an average of 28.6 pounds, and their resting metabolic rates decreased significantly in response to dieting - which the researchers had predicted.

But once the women started consuming sufficient calories to maintain their new weight, their metabolism, after an adjustment for body composition, was similar to that of the women who didn't have a weight problem.

Even after four years, their metabolic rates were not much different from before they'd regained the weight. During this four-year period, the women had regained an average of 24 pounds,

Weinsier believes the set-point theory gained currency because scientists measured metabolic rates immediately after a dieter had cut back on calories, instead of waiting long enough for the person's energy balance to be restored. The theory attracted a big following, however.

"It's a nice kind of theory that takes the responsibility away from both the patient and the provider of care by saying this is a natural response of the body," Winnick said, adding, "and there's nothing we can do about it."



Kelly_S is offline  
Old 11-20-2000, 08:54 PM   #2  
DIET IS A 4-LETTER WORD
 
GailR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: in my house in Delaware
Posts: 1,539

Default

Kelly, thanks for the info. I think this is good news.

Gail
GailR is offline  
Old 11-20-2000, 09:02 PM   #3  
Wolfangel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Default

Then WHAT ELSE can I blame this fluffiness on?? Oh I know...genes! HA HA!

Of course NOW you are going to find an article on that one, aren't ya??
 
Old 11-20-2000, 09:36 PM   #4  
Junior Member
 
saar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: london ontario
Posts: 2

Default

This is good news, however, their sample size is very small, and I'm not sure if it is big enough to even be significant. I am happy though that it at least suggests that our metabolism isn't going to slow to a crawl like we've always been told.

sara

------------------
171/149.8/125
saar is offline  
Old 11-20-2000, 10:15 PM   #5  
Senior Member
 
Incredible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 16

Default

oh sure you can blame metabolism (or just about anything else).. but where does that get you?

Option #2... change it! I think there's more truth the the concept of a diet-related slowing of metabolism, than the above article suggests... hear me out here... lots of people cut back on food and don't exercise.. and end up dieting away muscle tissue as well as fat... and of course the less lean mass you have, the fewer calories you burn overall (not to mention the less strength and stamina you have to perform metabolism-boosting exercise). BUT it doesn't have to be this way!! Strength training will preserve (and maybe increase) the amount of muscle you have... and stave off these "slow metabolism" effects. Trust me, i'm living proof... i weight train regularly, i've been maintaining (in fact still losing a little) since July, and i eat lots...

Deb
195/136
Incredible is offline  
Old 11-20-2000, 10:46 PM   #6  
Cowboy Up Chick
Thread Starter
 
Kelly_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,796

Default

All the article is saying is that the metabolic rate didn't change much from before to after.

I agree the study group was small but at least it is a start.
Kelly_S is offline  
Old 01-02-2001, 11:08 PM   #7  
Cowboy Up Chick
Thread Starter
 
Kelly_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,796

Default

pullling up this info for the influx of newbies
Kelly_S is offline  
 

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
10 Things You Need to Know About Losing Weight KforKitty UK Fat Chicks 17 06-04-2009 05:21 AM
Are your birth control pills making you fat? Jenskihere Dieting with Obstacles 30 09-03-2008 12:07 AM
I don't know if it's me or I actually have a health problem... melly17 20-Somethings 17 10-11-2006 02:18 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.