Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-10-2005, 03:33 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Softykins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 221

S/C/G: 319/307/145

Height: 5'8"

Question How many calories do you gals allow yourself?

Being a 300+ gal, I was wondering how many calories you
all allow yourself per day. Is 1200 too low? If I eat more,
would I still lose weight? I'm feeling really tired lately (totally drained) and
I'm thinking it's because I'm eating too little but I'm worried
that if I up it, I won't lose weight. Any ideas? Do share!
Softykins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2005, 04:49 PM   #2  
Happiness is a journey
 
LeanneAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 51

Default

Hi Kristy,
There are a few calculators out there that will work out what someone should be eating calorie-wise to maintain, and to lose weight. Your BMR (Basal metabolic rate - the amount of calories you burn by just living all day) is given by the formula:
655 + (4.3 x weight in lbs.) + (4.7 x height in inches) - (4.7 x age in years)
Then you have to add more if you have a fairly physical job, or expend a lot of energy by exercise each day. Then subtract 500 calories to give you a number that will result in you losing weight.

SO for example, if I was 300 lbs exactly, 5'9" and 41 yrs old then
BMR = 655 + (4.3 x 300) + (4.7 x 69) - (4.7 x 41) = 2076 cals
I don't have a very physical job so I wouldn't add any calories for that, so if I wanted to lose, I would subtract 500 from 2076, and so I should be eating 1576 cals per day.

I would say that 1200 cals is way too little for you, and the tiredness you are experiencing is your body adjusting for "starvation conditions" and lowering your BMR, so you can survive on those calories. Unfortunately lowering calories very low will mostly mean that we stop losing weight, because our body has gone into coping-with-starvation-mode and will lower the BMR and start using energy very efficiently!

For the record, I was losing about 2 lbs a week regularly last summer, on an average of 1800 cals/day and exercise 5 times a week.

Hope this helps!
LeanneAU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2005, 06:35 PM   #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Softykins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 221

S/C/G: 319/307/145

Height: 5'8"

Default

Thanks so much Leanne! I really appreciate it.
I will have to do the math (it has never been my strong point. lol)

Hmmm... this doesn't seem right.

BMR=2101.5..... 2101.5 + (4.3 x 291) + (4.7 x 67.4) - (4.7 x 28) so...
2101.5 + (1251.3) + (317.25) - (131.6) = 3538.45
3538.45 - 500 = 3038.45

LOL I think 3038 calories would be waaaaaaaay too much!!!

Last edited by Softykins; 12-10-2005 at 07:38 PM.
Softykins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2005, 09:42 PM   #4  
Moderator
 
Heather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,704

S/C/G: 295/225/back to Onederland

Height: 5'5"

Default

Don't forget that above the BMR, you burn calories doing every little thing.

Over a week, I try to average about 1900 cals/day... when I started at about 300 I lost on 2000/day. Kristy, at 3000 cals, you might lose (though those formulas are not that accurate, they can be a guideline), esp if you're exercising, though it might be quite a slow loss. Right now my husband is losing at about 2300/day... It depends on a lot of factors.

Subtracting 500 theoretically results in a loss of 1 pound/week (500 cals x 7 days = 3500 calorie "deficit" for the week).

EIther way, I personally think 1200 calories is WAY to low at that weight. If 1200 is the LOWEST generally recommended by docs then doesn't that imply that is for the SMALLEST people???

Why not try 2000 calories per day for a while and see what happens. You can always adjust from there. Do you log what you eat? I use nutridiary (which also does have some of these calculations and they have worked for me, though many find them unreliable). Others use fitday.

Good luck!
Heather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 02:48 AM   #5  
Senior Member
 
elmay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 201

S/C/G: 305/247/<200

Height: 5'9"

Default

Kristy, you might be surprised. I've been averaging somewhere between 2000 and 2200 calories/day since the beginning of September. There have been a few real "binge" days (e.g. today) and a few days where I have been around 1200-1500. Overall, though, I try to stay around 2200.

I have done something called "BodyGem" which tests your resting metabolic rate and extrapolates your calories/day from that. It says I burn 2580 calories/day just living (which is a little higher than the BMR calculators on the web have said). I was shocked when my trainer said I should eat > 2000 calories/day -- I thought she was nuts. But, she said that if I eat too few calories, my metabolism slows.

The main reason I feel like I can get down to a normal body composition is that I'm not starving hungry and weak all the time like I have been before when I tried to lose weight. I could never imagine how people managed to stay slim if they were that hungry all the time -- now I realize I was eating too few calories or the wrong kind of food. I've only come 30 pounds, but I've never lost weight before without feeling like I was starving.

Good luck!
elmay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 03:07 AM   #6  
Happiness is a journey
 
LeanneAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 51

Default

Hi Kristy ... I think the problem was that you started with 2101.5 not 655

The formula is
BMR = 655 + (4.3 x weight in lbs) + (4.7 x height in inches) - (4.7 x age)

So your BMR would be
655 + (4.3 x 291) + (4.7 x 67.4) - (4.7 x 28) which is
655 + 1251.3 + 316.78 - 131.6 = 2091 cals (to the nearest calorie)

So to lose, you should be aiming at about 1600 cals/day, if you aren't doing any exercise at all, and if you are fairly sedentary. If you are moving around a lot, or doing exercise, you add to that.
You definitely shouldn't go lower than that. I had the same experience as Elmay - I thought my dietician was nuts when she told me to eat more, but I actually lost weight when I ate more, and stopped when I starved myself ... got to love your body and how efficient it is!
LeanneAU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 03:32 AM   #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Softykins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 221

S/C/G: 319/307/145

Height: 5'8"

Default

awe thanks ladies! This helps out a lot. I haven't lost
in 3 weeks so this is most likely the problem.

I hate counting calories but I guess I'll have to bite
the bullet and just do it.

Thanks again!
Softykins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 08:10 AM   #8  
Junior Member
 
RebeccaJohnsonx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 25

Default Too Low

1200 is too few. I also started at 2000/day when I was 330 and have lost 1-2 pounds a week. I eat about 1400-1600 now. Also, about the energy, there was an article in the November edition of Health that said if you are just beginning a workout routine and are getting tired instead of energized, you may not be getting enough iron (especially around the girl time). I don't know if this is true or not, but I remember many days of being drained when I should have felt energized.
RebeccaJohnsonx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 08:13 AM   #9  
Staying in 1derland!
 
curlylocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: southern MD
Posts: 1,997

S/C/G: 288/ticker/155

Height: 5'5"

Default

try using fit day kristy.. it makes the calorie counting much easier..
curlylocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 12:59 PM   #10  
742,000 calories burned
 
CatherineM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,672

S/C/G: 592/380/175

Height: 5'9"

Default

I don't know where that 1200 calorie a day thing came from, but I followed it religiously in the beginning. I had a 5 month plateau where I lost nothing even though I didn't cheat, and was walking for the first time in a decade. I didn't start losing weight until I increased to 1700-1800 calories a day. I've had a few days in the last couple of weeks where I've been over 2000. When you are over 300 pounds, you just burn so many more calories than skinny women do. When I was almost 600 pounds I imagine I burned more calories with a good fart than most 100 pound women would running a marathon. I have to eat at least 500 calories for breakfast to make it through 2 hours of water aerobics, and then I have to have an apple waiting in my locker to have the energy to safely drive home. We've never listened to our bodies well over the years, so now is as good a time as any to learn. Lack of energy is something you have to listen to. Shoot for healthy eating first. If you are eating healthy, you shouldn't be so tired. The one thing that became very clear to me when I really started measuring my food and keeping track of calories, is that I must have been eating 6000 calories a day sometimes.
CatherineM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 06:16 PM   #11  
Moderator
 
Heather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,704

S/C/G: 295/225/back to Onederland

Height: 5'5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hippievanlady
When I was almost 600 pounds I imagine I burned more calories with a good fart than most 100 pound women would running a marathon.
*chuckle* Catherine -- thanks for the good laugh! You said it better than I ever could have!

I think a lot of people hear 1200 is the "magic" number and think less calories is better, but I think that's dangerous for people our size... it may not permanently hurt you, but it certainly may cause lack of energy, and when you're losing weight, you need energy! For me, one of the best things that's happened as I changed my diet is that I have MORE energy late in the afternoon, when I used to want to nap everyday...

Eat healthy, try for 2000 calories, and see what happens. You can always adjust down from there.
Heather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 06:33 PM   #12  
Senior Member
 
mom2fivesweeties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southwestern Illinois
Posts: 539

S/C/G: 322/255/175

Height: 5'6"

Default

Hi Kristy,

I never replied to your post to me about us starting at the exact same weight and having lost the same! We are doing this as ya ya sisters! Yayyyyyyyy!

I totally agree with the other ladies - several years ago I tried the Optifast plan (the one Oprah lost 60+ pounds on) and didn't eat a thing for 7 days - just their shakes - I only lost three pounds. I was devastated! Once I started eating normally (healthy), I lost 5-6 pounds in as many days -

Since I joined LAWL in September, I've been really eating healthy and am never hungry - I just wasn't eating enough when I tried to lose on my own.

Now if I could just figure out why I ended up in the hospital on Friday, we'll be alright! They said my potassium was wayyyyyyyyy low - I don't think this diet is low on it, but who knows?
mom2fivesweeties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2005, 01:01 PM   #13  
Senior Member
 
christineu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 295

Default

I agree with the others that 1200 is way too low. Were do you go from there as you lose weight or hit a plateau? I started with WW several years ago and someone gave me a conversion of the points to estimated daily calories- its about 50 calories per point plus about 250 calories for the no point vegetables & higher fiber foods. At your current weight, you would be at 29-34 points per day or about 1700-2000 calories per day. For every 25 pounds you lose, the range drops 2 points or 75-100 calories; which is a pretty reasonable way to adjust as our bodies change...you don't have to follow WW plan but you can use their framework as a guide.
christineu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2005, 08:25 PM   #14  
Moderator
 
Heather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,704

S/C/G: 295/225/back to Onederland

Height: 5'5"

Default

Christine -- Thanks for the WW info. Even though I'm not following their plan, I've always thought they used a really reasonable approach to weight loss.
Heather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 07:49 PM   #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Softykins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 221

S/C/G: 319/307/145

Height: 5'8"

Default

Well ladies, I took your advice, I raised the calories a bit -
I added little snacks in between meals. I'll let you know if
it makes a difference - I weigh myself on Mondays!

Hey Christine, I'm gonna use your dragonfly thingy in
your siggy - it's too cute!
Softykins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.