Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-15-2005, 04:20 PM   #1  
I climb mountains!
Thread Starter
 
lessofsarahtolove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 2,188

S/C/G: 284/208/145

Lightbulb Glycemic Index/Load Info

Hey, everybody! I've been refreshing my memory and renewing my focus on some nutritional and exercise principles, and eating low glycemic is one of them. I thought I'd share some of this info with you all, in the hopes that it helps someone in some way. Different strokes for different folks -- but I found it very interesting and extremely supportive of my weight loss, and perhaps it might be for some of you as well. That said, here are some highlights, and a couple of links. If you already know about eating low GI and have had experience with it, chime in!

Here's a good explanation of the overall concept of the Glycemic Index:

The Glycemic Index, Simpler
By Sally Squires

Tuesday, September 7, 2004; Page HE01

Corn flakes, ice cream, instant oatmeal, mashed potatoes, french fries and couscous.

A recipe for a bad clean-out-the-fridge dinner? No, a list of foods that raise blood sugar levels higher than pure table sugar does. Or, to put it differently, foods with a high glycemic index.

With an estimated 17 million Americans already diagnosed with diabetes and millions more likely to develop it, eating according to the glycemic index -- that is, taking into account how much a food raises blood sugar and overtaxes insulin production -- is gaining interest from scientists, physicians and the public.

Some think that the glycemic index could even help settle the acrimonious debate between low-carbohydrate and low-fat eating plans.

"It's the perfect compromise between the two," said David Ludwig, director of the Optimal Weight for Life program at Children's Hospital in Boston. "It's recognized as healthy, it's much more flexible. It doesn't involve severe restriction of either fat or carbohydrates and will be vastly easier to follow, much more satisfying and less psychologically challenging. . . . It's very consistent with the Mediterranean diet.'"

Eating according to the glycemic index hasn't been overlooked by diet book authors. The best-selling "Sugar Busters" (Ballantine) series, by a group of New Orleans doctors, is based on the glycemic index approach. So is the "Eat Yourself Slim" (Erica House) series by Michel Montignac and the more recent "Glycemic Index Diet" (Workman) by Rick Gallop. The concept is also a key part of the popular "South Beach Diet" (Rodale).

Low glycemic foods include plenty of fruit, vegetables, beans, nuts, whole grains and healthy fat, such as olive and canola oil, plus lean meat, poultry without the skin and seafood. High glycemic foods are generally highly processed foods, with minimal amounts of fiber and lots of sugar. But there are exceptions -- including white potatoes, which have a significantly higher glycemic index than sweet potatoes.

In recent years, studies have pointed to benefits of low glycemic foods not only for controlling blood sugar and body weight, but also for reducing levels of unhealthy blood triglycerides and boosting beneficial fat, high-density lipoprotein (HDL).

Eating a diet rich in low glycemic foods also seems to cut levels of C-reactive protein, an indication of inflammation associated with increased heart disease risk.

Most recently, "studies show that low-glycemic-index foods seem to potentially have a protective effect for some types of cancer, especially for colon cancer," said David Jenkins, chairman of nutrition and metabolism at the University of Toronto.

Exactly how high glycemic foods may impact health risk is still under investigation. But an animal study published by Ludwig in last week's issue of the British journal The Lancet provides some clues. In the study, one group of rats ate a starchy diet of high-glycemic foods while another received a starchy diet of low-glycemic food.

The study found that the rats eating high-glycemic food had 71 percent more body fat and 8 percent less lean body mass than those on the low-glycemic diet -- despite weighing the same.

The animals that ate high glycemic food also had significantly higher blood glucose and insulin levels, three times the blood levels of trigylcerides and more cell abnormalities in the pancreas, the organ that produces insulin.

The findings suggest, Ludwig said, that "glycemic index is an independent factor that can have dramatic effects on the major chronic diseases plaguing developed nations -- obesity, diabetes and heart disease." While these findings come from a study on rats, the evidence warrants further investigation in humans, Ludwig said.

Until scientists sort out all the glycemic index issues, here's what experts recommend:

No need to play the numbers. Sure, you can find plenty of glycemic index food lists to buy, read religiously -- and drive yourself crazy.

"I recommend against eating by the number for any diet," said Ludwig, who advises action that will sound very familiar to Lean Plate Club members: "All you need for most situations is to eat an abundant amount of fruit and vegetables and legumes [beans] and cut back on foods with refined starch and concentrated sugar," he said. "Fats can be eaten liberally as long as they are healthful fats. You need adequate amounts of protein, which could quite easily be from vegetarian sources" such as soy and other beans.

Eat little and often. Consume five to six small meals about two to three hours apart to keep blood sugar levels -- and insulin production -- steady. But the operative word here is small: about 200 to 300 calories per meal. If those little meals grow large, odds are you will, too.

Skip the whole-wheat pasta. Unless you really love it. White pasta is a dehydrated food that ranks low on the glycemic index, in fact "markedly lower than white bread," said Ludwig. Whole-wheat pasta simply has added wheat bran, which adds some fiber but "which does not lower the glycemic index at all," Ludwig notes. So have the regular pasta -- just be sure to limit portions to a cup of cooked pasta or less.

One more tip: Eat pasta al dente, cooked until firm but chewy. "It not only tastes better," Ludwig notes, "But it also has a lower GI index."

Add some healthy fat. Ludwig, Jenkins and Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public Health are among the growing number of scientists who say that evidence suggests healthy fat -- olive, canola, safflower, sunflower and flaxseed oils, for example -- can help both with satiety and keeping blood sugar levels even.

Go ahead, snack. Just be smart about it. Choose popcorn instead of potato chips. Dip slices of red pepper, baby carrots and celery into bean dip, guacamole (a source of healthy fat) or salsa. Sip vegetable juice instead of fruit juice. Better yet, eat the fruit itself with a few nuts. And if you're tempted to have a sweet treat, make it a small one with a mix of sugar, healthy fat and protein, such as M&M's with peanuts.

Mix it up. That's an easy way to reduce the blood sugar effects of your favorite high-glycemic foods. So if you can't live without a sesame bagel, Rice Krispies and white rice, simply add foods that have a lower glycemic index to mute the rise in blood sugar. Eat those Krispies with skim milk, berries and a few nuts. Spread whipped regular cream cheese -- not nonfat, which is a high glycemic food -- on just half a bagel and add a slice of smoked salmon. Eat white rice with plenty of vegetables, a little lean meat, poultry, fish or beans.

Boost physical activity. In China, where white rice is a staple, rates of obesity and diabetes have been relatively low until recently. Not only is a more Western diet creeping into the country, but physical activity is declining. The glycemic index "probably doesn't matter at all, provided that you keep your body mass index under 23," Jenkins said. "If you stay skinny and physically active, you don't have to worry about all this nonsense."

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer


Here's Dr. Andrew Weil's EXCELLENT explanation of the Glycemic Load, which is really more important than the Glycemic Index:

The glycemic index (GI) ranks carbohydrate foods on the basis of how quickly the body turns them into blood sugar (glucose), provoking an insulin response. For many people, eating a lot of foods high on the glycemic index can lead to loss of sensitivity to insulin, the hormone needed to allow blood sugar to enter cells for use as fuel. This prompts the pancreas to overcompensate and crank out even more insulin, which can promote weight gain, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes.

But the glycemic index can be misleading because it doesn’t tell you how much carbohydrate is in an actual serving of a particular food. The rankings are based on eating 50 grams of carbohydrate per food listed and, in some cases, you’re not likely to eat that much. For example, if a food is 50-percent carbohydrate, you would need to eat 100 grams (less than a quarter pound) of it to get your 50 grams of carbs, but if it was only 10-percent carbohydrate, you would have to eat more than a pound. To understand how a carbohydrate food affects your blood sugar, you need to know both its ranking on the glycemic index and how many grams of carbohydrate a normal serving contains. This measure is the glycemic load, which can be calculated by multiplying the carbohydrate content per serving by the food’s glycemic index number. Although you’ll see glycemic index rankings written as whole numbers, they actually are percentages, advertisement

so if the GI of a food is 71, treat this as 71% when you multiply it by the grams of carbohydrate in a serving. Foods with a low glycemic load rank from one to 10; those with medium load range from 11-19 and those with high glycemic load rank at 20 or above.

Here’s an example of the perspective you get by calculating glycemic load. Judging from their high glycemic index – up to 97 in some studies - carrots would seem to be a food to avoid if you are carbohydrate-sensitive. But to get 50 grams of carbohydrates from carrots, you would have to eat a lot of them because the percentage of carbohydrate is low. A half-cup serving of carrots contains only 6.2 grams of carbs, so the glycemic load of that portion would be 6.2 x 97%, or 6, a low value. By contrast, a plain five-ounce bagel provides 65 grams of carbohydrate and has a GI of 72. Its glycemic load (65 x 72%) is a whopping 47.

You can find examples of glycemic load rankings of various foods at http://www.50plus.org/Libraryitems/2...cemicload.html. While the concept of glycemic load is helpful, doing calculations for everything you eat isn’t always practical. You can make better choices about carbohydrates simply by replacing processed and refined foods (such as snack foods, white bread and sugary desserts) with fruits, starchy vegetables (such as sweet potatoes and winter squash), whole grains and beans.

Andrew Weil, M.D.


Here are links to a few helpful resources:
lessofsarahtolove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2005, 09:19 PM   #2  
Senior Member
 
irishgreengables's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 380

Default

This is very helpful. Thanks Sarah. I am always skeptical of diets that ask you to give up an entire food group in order to lose weight -- like fruit, as in many low-carb diets. I like the way he explains GI here.

Peace,
Paula
irishgreengables is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 11:02 AM   #3  
Tenacious
 
DeterminedInGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 134

Default

Thanks for the information Sarah! I'm now on my second viewing of this message because the first time I only partially read it so I didn't get all the facts in that I should have. I had given up watermelon because it contained so much natural sugars that I thought it would be bad for me. But looking though informatoin on GI and GL I've found that even though the GI is high, the GL is low so it's actually good for me! Now that I've read your message completely, I'm off to find some more low-glyernic index foods that I can add into my diet and then I'm going to the grocery store!
Melissa
DeterminedInGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 12:44 PM   #4  
Senior Member
 
kykaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 3,171

Default

That's a great article. I have been eating low GI/GL for 6 months now. It's a great way of eating, and makes it a lot easier if you have to feed others whilst you are looking after your weight. My dh has hardly noticed we are eating healthily. Luckily he loves pulses, beans, chickpeas etc. And you can always add extras to a meal for the non dieter.

Yuo do have to remember that the magic low GI eating is to keep an eye on fat intake as well. Fat brings down the GI of a meal, so some things that are low GI can be relatively high in fat, so don't forget to count calories or at least keep an eye on them. That's where many people come unglued.

I love low GI and it's a plan I can stick to for the rest of my life.
kykaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 12:50 PM   #5  
I climb mountains!
Thread Starter
 
lessofsarahtolove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 2,188

S/C/G: 284/208/145

Default

That's a REALLY good point, kykaree. I ate this way the whole time I was losing last year, and I'm back at it for the most part now. I approach it this way: calories first, then how can I spend the calories? It's at that point that adhering to a the low glycemic load comes in. It all works, because the low glycemic load stuff I'm picking is also very, very healthy -- so i feel like I'm doing the very best for my body.

Another way to lower the glycemic load of a meal that contains carbohyrates is to add protein, which I try to do at all my meals and snacks.
lessofsarahtolove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 02:21 PM   #6  
Senior Member
 
Jenaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 399

Default

Thanks Sarah - I really appreciated this info. It is the same for me - when I consciously plan and eat low GI, my weight comes down. I find it interesting to read about inflammation. There was a recent article I read in the newspaper which also discussed inflammation and the correlation with cancer (not just colon as this article sited). For example, in India, the food eaten is primarily all low GI and they have the lowest rates of certain cancers. This article touted it being related to curry spices having an anti-inflammatory properties (sorry, I threw the paper out so I am sketchy on my details but this is what was suggested). The author of the article, a cancer specialist, also discussed how he takes 500 mg. daily of cucumerin (?) - whatever supplement that is - for his own cancer prevention program.

I digress, I just find it interesting that I am seeing more about inflammation related to the foods we eat and the type of food (i.e. low GI) having such a significant impact on well being - be it cancer and/or weight.
Jenaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.