Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2011, 03:08 PM   #1  
No Excuses
Thread Starter
 
luposlipaphobia87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 115

S/C/G: 169.8/159/135

Height: 5'4

Default Just Wondering... (Calorie Calculating Related)

I was just wondering if anyone has ever used the Mifflin St. Jeor formula to calculate their daily calories. My mom is a dietitian and used this formula to calculate my calories. This is the woman's formula.

10 x weight in kilograms + 6.25 x height in cm - 5 x age in years - 161

Then you take that number and multiply it by your activity factor.

1.200 = sedentary (little or no exercise)
1.4 = lightly active (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/week)
1.6 = moderately active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week)
1.8 = very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week)
1.9 = extra active (very hard exercise/sports and physical job)

So my calories end up being ~1700 a day to lose a pound a week. I hear this method is considered more accurate than the other methods out there, but I was wondering what your guys experience was with it, if any.
luposlipaphobia87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 04:06 PM   #2  
Calorie Counter
 
Jesse Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Myer's Park
Posts: 258

S/C/G: 250 (Sept 2009)/177/150

Height: 5' 9"

Default

Looks a lot like the Harris Benedict with subtle changes but the same results.

655 + (9.6 X weight in kilos) + (1.8 X height in cm) - (4.7 X age in years)

You're missing some things though. You need your parenthesis to make the equation work.

Activity multiplier for maintenance:
1. If you are sedentary (little or no exercise) : Maintenance = BMR x 1.2
2. If you are lightly active (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/week) : Maintenance = BMR x 1.375
3. If you are moderatetely active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/week) : Maintenance = BMR x 1.55
4. If you are very active (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days a week) : Maintenance = BMR x 1.725
5. If you are extra active (very hard exercise/sports & physical job or 2x training) : Maintenance = BMR x 1.9

Last edited by Jesse Taylor; 01-21-2011 at 04:08 PM.
Jesse Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 05:27 PM   #3  
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,383

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

I was actually surprised at the accuracy (for me, only of course, I can't speak to anyone else) of the Mifflin-St Jeor calculation. I didn't expect it to be any more accurate than the other calculators, but I was very pleasantly surprised. It came far closer to my actual experience than other estimators I've used. It still slightly overestimates my maintenance calorie level, but I think that's only because my health issues make me less sedentary than average sedentary. My actual maintenance calories are a little higher than BMR, but not quite that given for sedentary. More a factor of 1.1 or 1.05 than 1.2
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.