Quote:
Originally Posted by JulieJ08
I wonder if the same thing might happen if they repeated it with a different group of men. I mean, the improvement was 4.1% ... +/- 4.1%, and they don't say much about the statistical significance.
|
It very well might. But it does get old that virtually all research on the body is done on men. Medical, exercise, pretty much everything. What's sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose.
Wouldnt want to mess up any of that old testing by having to figure out if TOM is interfering in anyway (I seriously have quicker recovery time and way more energy at certain points in my cycle)