Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2010, 10:31 AM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
K-boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 261

S/C/G: 282/257/when it feels right

Default Ideal Weight or Happy Weight? How Much Should You Weigh?

Wasn't sure where to post this but found this article on WebMD and thought it was pretty interesting.

Ideal Weight or Happy Weight? How much weight do you really need to lose?
K-boogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:35 AM   #2  
Live. Laugh. Love.
 
InControl2Day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 486

S/C/G: 191.5/126/120

Height: 5'1

Default

Love this post Thank you for posting this

for people out there like me who tend to rush things... this reminds me to slow down and take it slow because it'll be more beneficial in the long run!!

(favorite-ing this post)
InControl2Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:36 AM   #3  
Senior Member
 
Aclai4067's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,559

S/C/G: 337.4/322/155

Height: 5'8

Default

Frankly I don't have the patience to take a six month break every time I lose 10%. I've been fat long enough. This article seems aimed more towards people who have like 30 lbs to lose, as opposed to 135. As far as the happy weight v. ideal weight. I guess I don't know when I'll reach a happy weight yet. I have no memory of ever being at a happy weight. I know a happy weight will be one where I can wear normal clothes and be athletic, which sounds pretty damn close to my ideal weight.

Last edited by Aclai4067; 01-06-2010 at 10:37 AM.
Aclai4067 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:47 AM   #4  
Senior Member
 
rachinma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 575

Height: 5'3"

Default

My ideal weight (per the weight charts) is *no more than* 141. I know that the last time I weighed 141 was at age 22 (I'm 36 now) and I had no job and exercised 2x a day and could barely afford food. So, I don't think 141 is my set point.
rachinma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:48 AM   #5  
Senior Member
 
paris81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,381

S/C/G: 252-255?/ticker/145

Height: 5'6''

Default

Thanks for posting, this is very interesting.

I agree with Aclai though, it does seem to be more for people with less to lose. Not that losing 10% at any weight isn't beneficial, but I'd bet that any doctor would not be quick to encourage someone like me with just over 100 lbs to lose, to stop after just 10%. And if I took 6 months after every 10%, I'd never be done!

Still, it's an encouraging article, showing people that even a little bit is helpful. I feel that a small weight loss can be motivating for more weight loss!
paris81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:53 AM   #6  
Calorie counter
 
Eliana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,679

Height: 5'4.5"

Default

My plan is let my body do what it wants to do. If it wants to keep dropping, let it! When it starts to put up a fight, I've been thinking I'll maintain for a month and then give it another go. But I'm armed with information and this set-point logic makes sense. It just may get me through the next plateau. But I'm not going to just maintain for no reason and certainly not for six months.
Eliana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:53 AM   #7  
Just Yr Everyday Chick
 
JayEll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,862

S/C/G: Lost 50 lbs, regained some

Height: 5'3"

Default

I've come to agree with the ideas in this article.

I lost my 50 pounds by restricting more than that, and my weight did decrease more quickly, which I liked. But in maintenance I've been facing a struggle--because when I have tried to switch back to "diet mode," having gained a few pounds, I haven't been able to come up with the effort to keep on track for more than a couple of weeks. And I ended up eating more than my target (and gaining instead of losing). I'm up several pounds above my original goal.

So, currently I'm trying a maintenance approach similar to what this article states, except that I'm aiming for a calorie level of 10 x the weight I'd like to be at. I also use a weekly average as my target, not a set number every day.

I also keep up my exercise at a level I feel comfortable managing, which is 4 days a week, instead of trying for the 5-6 days a week I was doing during my main weight loss. I was beginning to have joint problems after exercising for so many years at that level.

I've been at this for a little over a month, and I can see that my weight is dropping, although quite slowly. However, as the article suggests, my goals are not scale number goals. Instead they are behavioral--how much I eat, and how often I exercise.

Jay
JayEll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:55 AM   #8  
Losing weight since 2009
 
Gracie789's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 482

S/C/G: 310/138/132

Height: 5'7

Default

I've got to agree with Ashley, the article does seem to be aimed at those with less significant amounts to lose. I don't have the patience to go down 10% then maintain for 6 months...at that rate it would take me 10 years to go from 310 to my goal, that's just not acceptable to me, lol.

Although I completely agree with the article about the problems with losings a lot of weight fast. Through a complete change in lifestyle (eating healty + exercise) I lost a bit over 100lbs in 2009. Even though I kept the loss at a gradual but steady pace, I developed health issues (GI stuff, and my gallbladder will be coming out later this year). It's an interesting article and something I might consider when I get closer to my goal, but for now I'll continue my plan. Thanks for sharing!!!!!!
Gracie789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 05:35 PM   #9  
onedayatatimer
 
luckymommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,277

S/C/G: 224/ticker/145-155

Height: 5'9.5"

Default

I liked that the article says to set behavioral goals more than lbs. lost goals, but I think it's best to do both....at least for me, and I know everyone is different.

Thanks for posting!
luckymommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:01 PM   #10  
ars
looking for onederland
 
ars's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 334

S/C/G: 300/ticker/165

Height: 5'9"

Default

Interesting article...but if I ate 10 calories for every pound I weigh, I'd be maintaining, not losing. If I ate 12 calories per pound, I'd be gaining! (At least according to my GoWear Fit.)

I don't know about the 6 months of maintaining the 10% loss either...I'd think for us heavier folks, IMHO, the sooner we are out of the obese BMI range, the better in the long run.
ars is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your Ideal Weight UrthWurm Weight Loss Support 65 05-26-2012 12:08 PM
Ideal Protein Diet - December Chat torchlaker Ideal Protein Diet 501 12-30-2009 08:54 AM
Ideal Protein Diet alwe74 Ideal Protein Diet 417 10-15-2009 02:26 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.