General Diet Plans and Questions General diet questions, support for various diet plans other than those listed below.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2002, 09:19 PM   #1  
Caden's Mommy
Thread Starter
 
Lucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 386

Height: 5'7

Default The Warrior Diet

Just wondering if anyone has tried the Warrior Diet and what their experience was with it...

seems like something I can do, but just wanted to get some other opinions

Thanks
Lucky13 is offline  
Old 07-12-2002, 06:06 PM   #2  
diamondgeog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Default

Never heard of it, but here is a bit more about it. I am not sure that the 'catch' of not eating during the day and then eating at night is valid. But if you notice he is eating a balanced, healthy diet when he does eat and probably eating a bit fewer calories by resticting himself during the day. I also understand that eating too much can make you feel bloated and sluggish and all manner of bad things. But I don't feel particularly good when I am hungry, I feel, well hungry. So I would say eating managable meals throughout the day is probably better then one huge meal at night...

Will dinner at 8 lead you to a 'Warrior's' body?

Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Sunday, April 14, 2002

It may sound like a dream come true for those who've been starving themselves on diets,
or driving themselves crazy trying to eat six small meals a day: Don't eat during the day,
then eat as much as you want at night.

Have we died and gone to heaven? Really, isn't this how couch potatoes get fat in the
first place?

But there it is in black and white: Regular overeating can help you lose weight, writes
Ori Hofmekler in his new book, "The Warrior Diet" (Dragon Door Publications, $26.95).

Hofmekler, a lean and sinewy 50-year-old Israeli man who made his name as a political
satirist in New York, is his own best advertisement for his diet -- he prefers "way of life"
-- so much so that he poses, shirtless, on the cover of the book.

He is certainly going against conventional wisdom, which urges people wanting to lose
weight to eat a substantial breakfast.

Instead, Hofmekler has an espresso, and perhaps a piece of fruit. During the rest of the
day, he eats a bit more fruit, some fruit juice and another espresso. Then, after his
6 p.m. workout, he goes home and eats whatever he wants.

"People are brainwashed to think breakfast is the most important meal of the day," he
says from his home in Manhattan. "But the most important meal of the day is dinner, after
the day's work is done, when you can relax with family and friends and eat as much as you
want, to feel relaxed."

Until then, he says, people should be hungry.

"It's good to be hungry, it translates into wonderful, creative energy that can feed you,"
he says. "It gives you a hunger for life. Think of how you are before you eat pasta and
after you eat it. Everything looks different when you're hungry. The fear of hunger is real,
but people through history have lived with hunger."

Or they did until the 20th century, in modern America, where for most people eating is
entertainment, 24/7. But Hofmekler says that our epidemic of obesity and disease is a direct
result of our tendency to eat through the day.

"Whether you're vegetarian or not, you're a predator, genetically speaking, which means
you're a hunter," he says. "And hunters used to go for days without finding food. Night
was only the time you could eat. Our bodies evolved to live that way."

Part of the problem, he says, is that the body needs to eliminate toxins as well as take
in nutrients, and when you spend your entire day taking in nutrients -- or worse,
nutrient-free processed food -- your body doesn't have an extended stretch in which it
can reverse the process and detoxify itself.

Hofmekler goes into great detail on what foods are the best to eat, but it boils down to
natural foods, not processed: fruit, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, meat, and diary
products like milk and cottage cheese.

So, when Hofmekler says he eats whatever he wants, he isn't eating Twinkies and Doritos
and TV dinners. Because, being in good shape, that's not what his body wants.

"If I sent you into the jungle for a couple of days, you would know what you wanted,"
he says. "You wouldn't crave a Twinkie, you'd want nuts or vegetables that would keep
you surviving. In other words, when you follow the right cycle of the Warrior Diet, you
develop a healthy hunger, a real hunger, a hunger for life, and the instinct will kick
in, and you'll enjoy your protein or veggies like nothing else."

Likewise, he is skeptical about diets that emphasize low-fat, or a high-protein,
low-carbohydrate combination.

"People can't deprive themselves from carbs, it's the wrong thing to do," he says.
"In the grain itself, in the fiber, there are nutrients you can't get any other way.
You need essential sugars and essential organic acids, which appear in fibers and
grains from other plants. Deprivation always leads to problems."

Likewise, he is a big fan of dairy, which is often downplayed in low-carb diets.

"The lactose that everyone is afraid of now is one of the best sugars you can put in your body,"
he says. "Your brain needs galactose, and you need to get it one way or another. Most people
have a phobia of the milk, but the sugar in the milk has the lowest glycemic index ever,
it's close to meat, and it doesn't raise your insulin levels."

Hofmekler also takes lots of supplements, but warns readers to be very careful about where
their vitamins and minerals are coming from, and how they're made. And he is absolutely
vehement in his injunctions against protein bars and protein shakes.

"Go for real food," he suggests. "Real food is cheaper, more enjoyable and it works better."

All of this, he says, is not about just losing weight, but of uncovering the "super-you"
underneath the fat. "I believe that the body will redesign itself if you give it what it needs," he says.

As for weight lifting, he's all for it, and gives some exercises in the book. But,
he says, the warrior way of life isn't just to be strong, but to be tough.

"We are living in a culture that adores strength, people equate power and strength,"
he says. "But strength is just the amount of force that an object needs to generate to
move something. I'm defining 'tough' as the ability to handle pressure through time.
The longer you can handle pressure, the tougher you are. Being tough is better than
being strong."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Writer
---------------------------
The Bee's David Barton can be reached at (916) 321-1075 or [email protected] .
 
Old 07-29-2002, 10:56 AM   #3  
Junior Member
 
notadeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9

Default

I totally agree with his choice of food, BUT we don't LIVE in a world conducive to eating at night. I get up at 5:00 AM and run 6 miles so I can be at work at 8:00. If I don't eat much for breakfast my blood sugar crashes and I can't get any work done - I can't even think straight.

Then I go lift weights at lunch, or swim. Again, I need to replace the glycogen or I crash again.

Finally, by 7 PM I start getting really sleepy and my metabolism slows WAAAAY down. It's time to sleep, not frigging EAT. If I do eat because there's a party or something I am miserable. I much prefer an empty stomach at night.

Besides, where does he come up with the idea that hunter-gatherers eat at night? The animals (at the waterhole) and fish are easier to catch in the morning. Also, you can see them to catch them better in the early sunlight than at dusk. Fresh-picked berries? Can't see em at night....
notadeb is offline  
Old 08-08-2002, 05:14 PM   #4  
Junior Member
 
notadeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9

Default some research to back ME up

OK, nobody's ragged on me yet, but I anticipate it. Here's more support for eating early in the day, and I got it from Obesity Research Journal. Night eating is a bad trap to fall into (this is just an abstract):
---------
Night Eating Syndrome Is Associated with Depression, Low Self-Esteem, Reduced Daytime Hunger, and Less Weight Loss in Obese Outpatients

Marci E. Gluck*,, Allan Geliebter, and Tracy Satov*,
* New York Obesity Research Center and Departments of
Medicine and
Psychiatry, St. Luke’s/Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University–College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Marci Gluck, Ph.D., New York Obesity Research Center, Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s/Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY 10025. E-mail: [email protected]

GLUCK, MARCI E., ALLAN GELIEBTER, AND TRACY SATOV. Night eating syndrome is associated with depression, low self-esteem, reduced daytime hunger, and less weight loss in obese outpatients.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the night eating syndrome (NES), measures of depression and self-esteem, test meal intake, and weight loss in obese participants.

Research Methods and Procedures: The study included 76 overweight (body mass index = 36.7 ± 6.5 SD) outpatients (53 women and 23 men; aged 43.5 ± 9.5 years) entering a weight loss program. They completed a Night Eating Questionnaire, the Zung Depression Inventory, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Based on criteria by Stunkard et al. (Stunkard A, Berkowitz R, Wadden T, Tanrikut C, Reiss E, Young L. Binge eating disorder and the night eating syndrome. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:1–6), participants had NES if they reported: (1) skipping breakfast 4 d/wk, interpreted as morning anorexia; (2) consuming more than 50% of total daily calories after 7 PM; and (3) difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep 4 d/wk. Eleven (14%) participants met the criteria for NES. After an 8-hour fast, all participants ingested a nutritionally complete liquid meal through a straw from a large opaque cooler until extremely full. They also completed ratings of hunger and fullness before and after this meal.

Results: Night eaters had higher depression (p = 0.04), lower self-esteem (p = 0.003), and less hunger (p = 0.005), and a trend for more fullness (p = 0.06) before the daytime test meal than the others. However, there were no significant differences in test-meal intake between groups. Nevertheless, test-meal intake was greater later in the day only for the night eaters (p = 0.01). Over a 1-month period, the night eaters lost less weight (4.4 ± 3.2 kg) than the others (7.3 ± 3.2 kg; p = 0.04), after controlling for body mass index.

Discussion: NES is a syndrome with distinct psychopathology and increased food intake later in the day, both of which may contribute to poorer weight loss outcome. NES criteria need to be better quantified and NES deserves consideration as a diagnostic eating disorder.


Key Words: night eating • test meal intake • eating disorder • sleep disorder • weight loss
notadeb is offline  
Closed Thread

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Beck Diet Solution – November 2008 – Group for Support, Discussion, Diet Coach BillBlueEyes LA Weight Loss 206 12-01-2008 04:49 AM
Warrior Diet soontobegoneforgood Does it Work? 13 07-05-2004 11:53 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.