Thanks for the reminder, Sandra. I DID get that skirt this morning -- but forgot to go back and check, so I did it just now.
WARNING: OPINION AHEAD -- and don't forget ... it's only my opinion! There's no need for lurkers to come out of the woodwork and argue with me, because I'm entitled to an opinion. Harrrump!
I think everyone sometimes forgets that it is actually possible to gain (or definitely to not lose) on healthy food. Without keeping up with how much is going in vs. how much is being burned, there's no point in doing it. Diets (such as Core, and this will probably be the unpopular part of my opinion, but here goes ...) that say "eat til satisfied" are really leaving the door open for abuse. Moderation is too subjective to just throw out there with no particular guidelines. Plus, overweight people usually don't know what moderation is, or we wouldn't have become overweight in the first place, right? WW saw that they were losing a big part of their market to South Beach and diets like that, and they had to jump on the "no counting" bandwagon as well. I know there are those who dearly love SB or SugarBusters or Atkins or whatever, and that's fine! I've had success on all three before. As we all know, there are always exceptions, but I think the percentage of people who regain their weight after a few years is pretty high. There is a valid reason why WW Flex (or calorie counting) has had the highest success rate. It makes you accountable for the amount of food you eat. The points formula, which takes into account the fact that if you eat higher fiber, you get to have more of it (because it lowers the points value) is a smart one.
Stepping down off of the

now.