Much as my title says, I'm a crunchy mama. I practice attachment parenting and believe that CIO is at odds with a child's psychological development. Especially in the first couple of months after they are born, children do not have wants but only needs. And yes, being held is a need. I feed on demand, I always have. I co-sleep as well, and once I got out of the hospital with the first two and was able to do that, I slept quite well.
I don't equate "good child" with "child whom I don't have to do much with." A friend of the family was very proud of how she took care of her kids when they were babies...she would nurse them, then swaddle them and put them back in their cribs til time for the next feeding.
So she considered them "good kids" because she didn't do much of anything with them...
I SAH, so I can afford to have a very flexible schedule. I don't want to do the same things at the same time every single day, so I don't expect the same of my kids. Of course, most kids will schedule themselves, when given the chance. The only schedule I have a problem with is feeding on a schedule. The earliest versions of BabyWise prompted several cases of malnoutrition. When babies go through growth spurts (and the first is at about 4 - 6 weeks), they
need to nurse more often than every three hours, so that mama's milk supply has a chance to catch up. It's not a parenting style, it's physiology.