Quote:
Originally Posted by cuteazz1
The 29 may equal the 1200 calories(or whatever number) that is "said" to be the lowest we shoulh go without messing up our insides.If person A who is 220 is on 29 points per day the only benefit I can see there is that person losing weight fast on the new program,telling people about it,AND being more encouraged to stay with the program...which means that WW makes more money in the end....It could also be that they want us to learn to eat at that level as it may be less confusing to keep on switching up the numbers as we lose every 10 pounds.....
I may be naive - or misunderstanding the new program as I haven't been to my weekly meeting since the switch (going Friday) and have just been reading and following along on the WW site - BUT, I do not think it is a question of losing weight fast.
I am at 29 points, and my friend who also does the program but weighs 30lbs less than me is also at 29 points. But since most fruit and vegetables are 'free', I can supplement my daily food intake with F&V to satisfy any additional hunger/nutritional needs I may have over my leaner friend. So theoretically, while we have the same number of points, I am taking in more calories than my friend. As I lose weight, I will probably eat less while still maintaining the recommended amount of F&V per guidelines.
Also, and I may be wrong on this but I seem to recall reading on the WW site that while 29 is the goal, it is not necessary to eat all of the daily points like we did on the old plan. So, just because you have them, doesn't mean you need to eat them, if you are not hungry and have met nutritional guidelines.
With all that said, this is one of the things I will be getting clarification on from my meeting leader on Friday!