I agree LLV. I will do it most likely forever, simply because I feel I have more "control".
Some loggers actually make their logging a huge ordeal-logging everything from protein/carbs/calories/fat grams and the whole nine yards, and if I did all of that-I would probably not stick with it, either. I think that keeping track of your daily intake can be as simple, or as complex, as you want it to be.
I simply jot down in a little notebook (always in my purse with a separate page for each day) the food eaten, the calories next to it, and add them up. I also "check" off my water intake which is really quick to keep my on track. it takes me maybe 1 MINUTE after every meal or snack. I find that for those who don't do it or do other methods, it is really no different than calculating WW points, or being on a plan where you count food exchanges or eat certain food groups at certain meals-you are keeping track of what you eat one way or another, no matter what plan you are on, really.
Rather than calculating every little thing-if I have nutrition "goals" in my head for each day (such as choosing whole grains instead of white, eating a couple servings of skim dairy/soymilk each day for calcium, and eating 5+ fruits and veggies each day) then I find that all of the other little things that others calculate (calcium~protein~daily fiber~etc.) tend to "take care of themselves". I don't have to write down everything-I can just glance at my intake for the day and see that I have only had 3 fruits/veggies, so at my next meal or snack I need to take care of that.
Once you have calorie counted for a long period of time-you don't have to look everything up, either. That simplifies things a lot. I know fully well that a small apple has about 80 calories and 5 fiber grams-so if I eat an apple, there is nothing to look up. I just jot it down. A small peach is about 40 calories, a small nectarine about 70, a cup of strawberries about 45, a small banana about 100. It isn't like it was when I first started and had to look everything up all of the time. For those who have tried calorie counting and couldn't deal with the calculations and quit after a couple weeks/months-it really does get simpler over time.
I don't drink regular soda, but I have been calorie counting for so long that I know if I ever choose to treat myself, that a Coke has 140 calories, a Pepsi has 150, and a Mountain Dew has 170. (for 12 oz. cans) There is nothing for me to look up-it would only take me about 10 seconds to jot down that soda and the calories-or 1 second to decide that the Coke would be the lowest calorie soda choice.
For me, it isn't a big deal or sacrifice at all to keep track of my intake.
