Quote:
Originally Posted by LittlePaperStars
In my opinion they do teach portion control.
They say eat until satisfied. Core foods are generally low in calories and take longer to digest. Keeping the dieter satisfied longer.
But then again, I don't like flex. To me it doesn't focus on healthy foods. To me, it focuses on whatever you want to eat, just counting the points, thus controlling portion but measuring. JUST MY OPINION
Well it is not the PLAN that does not focus on healthy foods it is the dieter or individual. If you read the plan it does focus on foods but it also allows the freedom to have that occasional not so healthy day.
I also agree with the previous poster that Core does not focus on portion control. Many of us are where we are because we don't know our satisifaction level and many confuse (even after reading on satisifaction levels) what ours is. I do mostly Core foods on Flex but when I tried flex (3 separate periods of 2-3 weeks at at time) I gained. I truly was not satisified because my mind knew I could have more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittlePaperStars
Keep in mind, everyone will be for or against a diet. All subject to opinion. Everyone has to try it for their self and not go by what another one thinks of a diet.
Actually I am for any plan that someone will stick with and allows them to lose although I think W/W is best --- both Core and Flex depending on the individual. I know many that go back and forth depending on their life between Core and Flex with success, I know those who failed on Core, I know those who failed on Flex, I know those who succeeded on Core and I know those who succeeded on Flex.
Personally I think there should be a program that is a combo (at least for the first few weeks) of both Core and Flex. Which is basically what I have done since week 1 back with 1-2-3 Success.
However my personal view (and this is strictly opinion) Core is much more of a diet and less of a lifestyle because of the restrictions it places...unless you use your WPA for real foods (I refuse to do fat free cheeses because they are just tasteless, I don't like fat-free salad dressings <however adding one of my healthy oils to a serving makes them tolerable>, I enjoy eating real bread <not always low cal diet breads>) then they get used up fast and thus leaving me deprived of maybe a treat once in a while or a dining out experience. To me dining out on Core is much harder.
[QUOTE=Multi116]There is no such thing as a "core" food. It isn't a different or special food. It is just food. Most of which has been a part of the way I eat long before Core, or South Beach or any of those things came along.[QUOTE] This is true however what denotes it as a Core food is the fact that it is following (your next point) the 8 Great Health Guidelines and a balanced diet plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multi116
WW promotes the 8 healthy guidelines for both programs, which includes fruits and vegetables, dairy requirements, consumption of whole grains and lean protein and drinking water. You can choose to eat healthy or unhealthy on either plan.
And this point is excellent because this is where most of the members fail. They want to enjoy all the junk that made them where they are. For me 90-95% of the time I am following but there are times when I just can't but I do my best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multi116
For me, "satisfied" was too abstract of a concept. I think there's a physical and psychological aspect to it and not having physical hunger didn't necessarily leave me "satisfied".
This statement is excellent. However the psycological aspect can be dealt with many people don't know how.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multi116
I'm not saying one plan is better than another. They are both good sound plans, it's just whatever one fulfills each individuals personal needs.
Ditto and what I said in the first post.