Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2005, 12:42 AM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
UnCafeCvooPlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 132

Default Question- why not just count calories?

Hi everyone,

I was wondering if there was any real difference between counting calories and doing weight watchers. Is it just easier to count points?

Last edited by UnCafeCvooPlay; 05-31-2005 at 12:45 AM.
UnCafeCvooPlay is offline  
Old 05-31-2005, 06:59 AM   #2  
Eat well, Live well
 
Allie Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 181

Default

I personally find it easier to count points, even though it includes looking at calories. The points system also takes fat and fibre into consideration, which encourages eating less fat and more fibre.

I used to count calories, and I found myself getting frustrated with that, because the numbers were high and not easy to add up quickly. Also, it was a little hard to be "accurate". With points, there is a range of calories that you can have for one point, so you don't have to be so picky about measuring an *exact* number of grams of food. I think this is more realistic, as it better prepares you to think about how much food you are eating when you go on maintenance.
Allie Abbott is offline  
Old 05-31-2005, 10:51 AM   #3  
Cowboy Up Chick
 
Kelly_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 3,796

Default

simplicity in the numbers is one reason that points are easier it is easier to count in the 'tens' (20, 22, 24 etc points a day)

and the fact that fat and fiber (we want a lower fat diet adn a higher fiber one -- fat is a penalty <ie, higher points> and fiber is a benefit <ie, lower points> are needed to have a healthy diet.
Kelly_S is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:53 AM   #4  
GmaTo8
 
Jane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Rural Indiana
Posts: 6,047

Default

As long as you stick to healthy foods, I think counting calories would work ok. That being said, let me also say I used to count calories and was never successful long-term. With WW, I have lost and kept off 85 pounds. I truly believe it is because of my mind-set, though. It couldn't have been the meetings since I was unable to go to those.

Imho, if you find a healthy way to lose, and can do it for the rest of your life, go for it!
Jane is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 09:55 AM   #5  
Senior Member
 
Emerald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: KY
Posts: 722

Default

As long as you eat a low fat, high fiber, balanced diet, I don't see why counting calories wouldn't work. I like the points better though. It's easier for me to look at my cappucino and say "3 pts" instead of 157 calories. Add that to 318 calories for such and such plus 421 calories for that. 3+6+8 is much easier for a daily on-going basis. And with WW, you get free veggies that have no points!
Emerald is offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.