As long as we're talking about cycling... just about everything I've read about cycling indicates you have high cal days alternated with low cal days. Here's an example of the way I understand it:
Example 1
Monday = 1,500 calories eaten
Tuesday = 1,200 calories eaten
Wednesday = 2,100 calories eaten
Total calories in = 4,800 or 1,600 average per day for the 3 days, regardless of exercise
My question is this. Is cycling determined solely by calories in? Or can you manipulate and cycle deficits? Would that have the same effect (keeping the metabolism guessing)? Here's an example:
Example 2
Monday = 1,500 calories eaten, 2,000 calories burned, deficit = 500
Tuesday = 1,500 calories eaten, 2,300 calories burned, deficit = 800
Wednesday = 1,500 calories eaten, 1,700 calories burned, deficit = 200
Total deficit = 1,500 or 500 a day for 3 days, which comes out to 3,500 calorie deficit, which should indicate a pound lost.
Or can you do some combination?
Example 3
Monday = heavy/heavy (eat heavy/work out like a fiend)
Tuesday = light/light (eat like a bird/rest all day)
Wednesday = light/heavy (eat like a bird/work out like a fiend)
I'm imagining the answer is Example 3, but I'd love to get some verification from those with more experience! Anything that can help break up a dad-blasted plateau!
TIA