Quote:
Originally Posted by QuilterInVA
Amyfay, could you please explain how muscle weighs more than fat? That is totally wrong. A pound is a pound. Muscle takes up less volume than fat so a toned person will have smaller measurements than someone who isn't.
|
Okay. I have something to say here because I feel like this is a little condescending- and that it is attacking her personally. Yes, a pound is a pound is a pound. But usually when you compare two things, something has to be constant. If you compare two phone for example- it's the fact that they both make phone calls that is constant, or maybe the price, or maybe some of the features. But there is something that is common.
It is the same with muscle. It is not the weight that we're saying is constant, it is the volume.
Density = Mass/Volume.
Muscle is more dense than fat, we all agree on that? Okay so, if the density of muscle is higher and the volume is constant, the mass of muscle IS more than the mass of fat. Ipso facto, she isn't wrong.
If you read the links, they say the exact same thing. Because you try lifting a box of lead, and a box of the same dimensions of feathers and then tell me that lead doesn't weight more. When someone says muscle weighs more, they obviously don't mean that a pound of muscle weighs more than a pound of fat. Because they are not that dumb.
I'm sorry if you feel like I attacked you, I didn't mean to. I just want to explain why muscle does in fact weight more than fat- or why people say that.