Quote:
Originally Posted by hhm6
I wanted to ask you!! I noticed your current weight says 152, have you been calorie counting? I feel like I've been staying in my calorie range of 1200-1400 and have not seen a loss (and this has been for awhile now!) I got down to 173 a few days ago (before I ate that stupid cookie) and I swear no loss since then!! I know I have to be more patient, but is it possible that some people just have to be extra strict? rather than eat whatever as long as it's in their calorie range?
Sorry if that sounds confusing. I just feel like I'm always trying to change my diet because I don't see a loss
A few different points here.
First, my current weight is actually not quite that low - I am working off a bit of a regain, as it says in my signature. But yes, I calorie-counted all the way down.
Some people do find that weight loss works better if they limit carbs as well as (or instead of) calories. "Works better" can mean "results in faster losses" but it can also mean "results in the same speed of loss but the plan is easier to stick to, cravings are lessened, etc." That is a very individualized thing and there is no way to know unless you try it. Except see below on what it means to "try something."
I never needed to explicitly limit carbs, even to get down to my lowest weight. Calorie counting was enough. One thing that happened to me, though, is that certain kinds of carbs almost became self-limiting, because the calories simply weren't worth it. If I could choose to spend 150 calories on an enormous helping of sauteed vegetables or a demure little half-cup cup of steamed rice, I am going to choose the vegetables nearly every time - because I like eating and I would rather eat the big plate of food. But I never cut carbs explicitly - my regular diet includes a sandwich on wheat bread almost every day, as many as 2-3 servings of fruit, even sometimes popcorn or a bag of pretzels.
Okay. On to patience and time. You said you got down to 173 a few days ago and have seen no loss since then. Well, a few days is simply not a meaningful time scale on which to measure fat loss. If you are lucky and stick to your plan, you will lose fat at the rate of a pound or two a week. But your total body weight depends upon a lot of other things besides how much fat you lost. Fluid retention varies depending upon a whole host of factors, some within your control and some not within your control. And fluid swings can be up to 5 pounds, easily masking a whole MONTH of fat loss. To evaluate whether your plan is working, you have to wait long enough to see your fat-loss pattern emerge from the noise of fluid-weight fluctuations.
So the meaningful time scale to evaluate how well your plan is working is not a few days or a week, but a month or two. I frequently see no loss for as much as three weeks - just bouncing up and down by a pound or two - and then finally get a "whoosh" of a few pounds loss that averages out to about 4 pounds lost per month. But I won't see a cooperative little march downward of a few ounces per day, absolutely not.
So if you are trying to evaluate whether a plan is working for you, I recommend sticking with it for at least a month (preferably two). See how you feel, how easy the plan is to follow, how well it fits your lifestyle, how comfortable you are on it - and how much weight you've lost on that meaningful time scale. Then tweak if you want to but know that it will take a month or two to evaluate the effectiveness of the tweaks!
This requires a lot of patience but there is an upside too - it might help you see how that one cookie or that one off-plan day is not as important as you are making it out to be. You do not need perfection to lose weight - only consistency over the long haul. When I lost 120 pounds I was not on plan every day. But I was on plan most of the time, for a long time. And that was enough.