Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2009, 11:32 PM   #16  
Senior Member
 
jendiet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 4,753

S/C/G: 217 /*/140

Height: 5'5"

Default

I am going with the unbalance of electrolytes theory as well.
jendiet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 05:45 PM   #17  
Never surrender
 
dragonwoman64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,751

S/C/G: 251 current/237 minigoal/180

Height: 5' 9"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaplods View Post
There are many risks associated with very low calorie diets: mitrovalve prolapse (a nother cardiac abnormality), Gallbladder stones and other gallbladder problems, blood pressure and blood sugar changes (diabetics and nondiabetics have died of low blood sugar), sodium depletion (a potentially fatal disorder, often associated with drinking large amounts of liquid or a too-low sodium diet), a condition called rabbit starvation (from intaking a high protein diet with too little carbohydrates and fats), kidney and liver damage (and quite a few that are more inconvenient than dangerous, such as dry, flaky skin, brittle nails and hair loss).
thanks for posting the information, wow. Much I didn't know. I have a cousin who went through an anorexia period and her hair got thin and very brittle. She looked like she was dying. Happy to say she overcame it and works as a nurse now. I'm sure some of the damage (to organs) from those types of "diets" or eating disorders must be irreversible.

I remember reading an article in the NYT magazine, quite a while ago, about a woman who developed odd eating habits, eliminating certain food groups entirely from her diet. she started to suffer from vitamin deficiencies, which is very dangerous. In this day and age, in communities where there's such a variety and amount of food available (not to mention store shelves crammed with bottles of vitamins and supplements), I think we can forget that our bodies need to have certain amounts of certain nutrients. You don't think about getting scurvy or rickets (!)

here at 3FC posters do seem more hyper aware and educated about diet and nutrition. I do know what it's like to my thinking go out of whack when a feeling of weight loss desperation sets in, though I can't remember doing anything too dangerous in that vein. I'm sure it happens all the time.
dragonwoman64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 09:20 PM   #18  
Junior Member
 
Babette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 27

S/C/G: 260/243.8/160 (High of 410)

Height: 5'7"

Default

This is such a sad story - it's really terrible that this ever had to happen. Thin brides? I think a LIVE fat bride would be better.
Babette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 10:32 PM   #19  
One day at a time...
 
Katie816's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 150

S/C/G: 229/ticker/129

Height: 5'4

Default

I don't think it was just because of the low calorie diet plenty of people do this and for the most part are fine. I mean look at the master cleanse fast (theres basically no calories thats why i bring it up) that so many people are trying out, nutritionally speaking it really can't be good for you but people (for the most part) aren't dying from it either. The diet might have been a factor in her health diminishing but I doubt it was solely the reason she died.
Katie816 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 11:13 PM   #20  
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,383

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie816 View Post
I don't think it was just because of the low calorie diet plenty of people do this and for the most part are fine. I mean look at the master cleanse fast (theres basically no calories thats why i bring it up) that so many people are trying out, nutritionally speaking it really can't be good for you but people (for the most part) aren't dying from it either. The diet might have been a factor in her health diminishing but I doubt it was solely the reason she died.
Plenty of people jump out of trees, and off of garage and house roofs and are fine, too (my brother and I did as children many times), but that doesn't mean that the people who do so and are aren't fine were injured or killed from something other than the jump. "Most people survive it unharmed," is true in "regular" russian roulette. Only about 1 in 6 will die during a game (assuming a 6 chambered revolver). Actually the odds are significantly better, because if someone is killed on their "turn" it generally stops the game. Just because the odds of survival are 83% or better, doesn't mean russian roulette is safe.

Just because 99% or 99.9% or 99.99% of crash dieters do so without permanent and obvious injuries doesn't mean crash dieting is safe, it just means that the "gun" holds 100, 1000, or 10,000 empty chambers. The "bullet" is still there.

As an example, just looking at one potential cause of death for healthy people who crash diet - hyponatremia (low blood sodium or water poisoning):

It's not at all impossible for a healthy person (even a professional athlete in top condition) to become dangerously sodium deficient. My mother was hospitalized for it (from drinking only about a gallon of fluids a day, combined with a low-sodium diet). For her, there was an additional factor, a blood pressure medication that lowered her threshold for the problem, but the kidney specialist called in said that while it was once an incredibly rare disorder, it's becoming more and more common among entirely healthy people without other risk factors. Until recently, the only "healthy" people that were likely to be at risk were marathon runners and other intense athletes, people trying to "pass" urine drug screens by chugging gallons of water, and people with severe ocd compulsions to drink water constantly. However, with more and more people dieting and the number of dieting myths that recommend very large amounts of water, he said he's seen more cases than ever before - among people with no underlying conditions, and expects the trend to continue (mostly blaming "crash dieting").

If "most people aren't hurt by it," were adequate justification to prove something safe, drug companies would never lose a wrongful death suit.

Last edited by kaplods; 09-13-2009 at 12:16 PM.
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.