Very interesting and thought-provoking posts by everyone! I was trying to think if I know a single person who's lost weight and kept the majority of it off for any significant period of time IRL. I couldn't think of one person. Everyone else I know who's lost weight has yo-yo-ed and gained it back. Those people mostly did "programs" or fad diets (like weight watchers, Atkins), no wls, but they are still either "on a diet" or "off a diet". They don't get the concept of "lifestyle change".
My BF's immediate & extended family was visiting a few weeks ago for a week-long vacation. We ate a few meals with them and I was thinking as I ate that I still put more on my plate than this group of fairly skinny or "normal"-sized people - even now. I did have more salad on my plate than most, but I had more of everything. It's no mystery to me why I have weight problems. I will never say "I don't/didn't eat too much" because that's just a lie! I have accepted that in order to maintain a healthy weight, I will always have to eat differently (drink differently), and work out differently than the majority of people I know. However it's so true that a lot of people are just ignorant of proper nutrition. "Sugar free" doesn't mean calorie free, a true portion is a lot less than what one receives at a restaurant, etc. etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glory87
I posted a few months back that food gets some kind of special pass in society. Eat it, it's yummy! Eat it, you deserve it! We aren't given carte blanche to indulge in other things just because they feel good (drugs, skipping work, sex with our best friend's boyfriend, etc etc). Why is food so darned special? Food is just food, it tastes good but it has consequences.
From what I know, cheap food hasn't been available to modern society on such a mass scale for more than about a half century. Revolutions in agriculture and technology have made food a lot cheaper and more readily available. Such an over-abundance of food is pretty new to us. Maybe as we get more "used" to having so much food available, we'll eat less...? I just watched a documentary on the History Channel about the rise of drugs in American society. It included the background of cocaine use, how it used to be in coca-cola, and was in all kind of tonics that were readily available to anyone who could walk in a drug store. Everyone was using it, and it wasn't thought of as anything dangerous. Finally people figured out that it was seriously addictive. Of course as someone noted food seems "safer" and of course one could live without cocaine, but not live without food. I know there's a big difference, but it's interesting to think about it from a historical and sociological perspective.
Maybe it's harder to behave healthily with food because we can't give it up, as one can give up alcohol, drugs, gambling, etc. (Please note I'm certainly not trying to trivialize addiction or how hard it is to overcome.) We need food to live.
I do have a friend whose insurance company would give her a discount for her gym membership. I can't remember what it was - full or partial reimbursement for membership fees, or just a discount on her premiums, but I believe there are a few plans that promote "healthy lifestyles". I agree that I think it's unfair many insurance co's will cover WLS, but not any other kind of weight loss or maintenance program. There are many valid options and should be given equal weight. With all the stats out there about how much $ obesity costs the health care system, you'd think insurance co's should want to promote any and all ways that might help people live healthier lifestyles!