If this has all ready been addressed my apologies.
For some reason the servers aren't refreshing
right this second so I can't find out. *g*
Regarding the coffee lawsuit. McDonalds was
completely and totally responsible for the burns
Ms. Liebeck suffered. They comprised 6% of her
79 year old body including but not limited to
inner things, genitals, perineum, buttocks and
groin.
She was a passenger in the car, not the driver.
The cup tipped and spilled into her lap as she
was adding cream and sugar. The car was stopped
at the time.
3rd degree burns. 8 days in hospital skin grafts
and debridement. Permanent scaring.
She tried to settle with McDonalds for the cost
of the hospital bill. $20000. They offered her
$800. She asked for mediation. They refused.
At the time of the incident McDonalds required
there coffee to be maintained at 185 degrees.
Coffee is normally found at 135 to 140.
The testimony proved 3rd degree burns will result
in any food/liquid over 180 within 2 to 7 seconds.
Hot becomes a hazard over 145 degrees period.
Over 700 people before Ms Liebeck had experience
burns. McDonalds knew this. Some were also 3rd
degree.
Previous requests from consumers and safety organizations to lower the temperature had been ignored.
The reason for the higher temp? Cheaper grade of
coffee which saved them money on free refills.
There own executives testified that they felt
it would be more fincially sound to pay claims
and worker's compensation benefits to people burned by their coffee, versus making any of
the changes being asked of them.
i.e. Better grade of coffee, lower temp thus resulting in possibly free and or more refills.
Some of the kinder remarks the presiding Judge
made concerning there conduct included wanton reckless and callous.
The jury initially awarded Ms Liebeck the sales
from 2 days worth of coffee as punitive damages.
The Judge Reduced that amount to $600,000.00
Burns are horrific for any age but when one
also considers the thinness and fragility skin affords chidren and elders?
It honestly makes me shudder. Had it happened to
my Mother I would have done my best to make sure
we weren't shuddering alone.
To find it's all in the name of curtailing the
number of free refills you might be obliged
to honor? *insert rude noise here*
Trust me. I want my hot stuff hot and my cold
stuff cold.
I don't however expect to require skin grafts
as an end result of that desire on my part.
Sorry for the soap box, but this is one case
they garnered a great deal of bad press on the
part of Ms. Liebeck with McDonalds coming across
as doing nothing wrong.
When they most assuredly did.
Skew