OK, this is bugging me and I don't know the proper forum for it, but I don't understand the media coverage of recent mass shootings. In particular, I'm thinking of the NIU shooting versus the Lane Bryant massacre. These both occurred in recent weeks, both in areas on the outskirts of Chicago (where I'm from). Five people were killed in each case.
The Lane Bryant shooting was being reported I think on the night of the Superbowl and the next day. The NIU shooting occurred on Valentine's Day. Once they reported the initial Lane Bryant shooting, they dropped the story. I had to do a little digging online to finally find out that they had a suspect in custody.
The NIU shooting is still all over the news, almost a week later.
My heart goes out to the victims and their families in both cases. But why has the NIU shooting received so much more attention? Is it possible that no one cares about the, ahem, types of people who shop at Lane Bryant? Or is it that there were so many witnesses to the NIU shooting, compared to no witnesses to the Lane Bryant shooting?
Discuss amongst yourselves...




One more thing that I have to say...I totally, completely, without a doubt am against gun control. I do not own a gun and criminals don't get their guns through legal measures...! Just sayin' ... and I will not say another word on the matter.