HI ladies,
Ok, I'm confused and would appreciate any help that anyone can give me.
From the information I've read over the past few months (I can't remember actual sources but I read it over and over), you have to work out at LEAST 45 minutes because you are only burning sugar before that. After the 45 minute mark you switch from burning sugar stores to burning fat. So that's what I've been going by, figuring longer work outs are better and I'm up to about an hour and a half....either all exercise bike or 1 hour bike and 1/2 an hour treadmill.
Now, I've been reading the Ladies who Lift board and a site they listed. From what I've seen, you should NEVER work out for more than 45 minutes-1 hour because your body is burning what it thinks is "useless muscle". From what I read, long work outs are counter productive to muscle building because you are tearing them back down. But I thought I was burning fat???
So my question, I'm starting weight training to add some muscle (just not be so flabby). But my big thing is losing all this extra weight. This whole time have I been losing muscle and not fat?? How to I balance? Which way is right??
Thanks in advance,
Amber


It is pretty confusing about burning fat, sugar, muscle! But basically, you lose *weight* by having a calorie defecit. The more calories you burn, the greater that defecit would be. However if you don't want to lose muscle, it's essential to weight train along side cardio!
). The first thing you burn is the glucose (sugar) in your bloodstream. Then you burn the glycogen in your muscles (and the tiny bit in your liver). After THAT your body starts using fat as fuel.
. But even if I loved it, I think I'd stick to somewhere around 45 minutes *in case* all the talk about losing muscle after 1 hour is true....I love my muscles too much to take a chance sacrificing them!!
.
, but I find a 15 minute walk on the treadmill post workout helps keep the soreness down a bit. Just a bit