Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-13-2007, 03:06 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mickey79sf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 178

S/C/G: 229/T/170

Height: 5'7

Question Ok. So I'm Confused

So.. i was reading around the site and i keep seeing these post about how many calories is to little. On one side it says that weightloss is based on calories in vs. calories out. just that simple.. but then people are saying that well if u eat to little then u are going to stall your weight loss and go into starvation mode. so i am . i ask because i entered what i ate into fitday yesterday and saw i was at about 900 for the day not intentionally, just kinda fell that way. but i know i eat like this pattern of food m-f for the most part. so.. do i need to up my cals in order to get the scale to budge or is it still cal in v. cal out? I have lost inches, just seems the scale is really reluctant to wanna budge. HELP
Mickey79sf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 03:32 PM   #2  
Onward and Downward
 
meowee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,485

S/C/G: 285/215/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

You will love this answer . . . Yes and No . . .

The real truth about "starvation mode" (although I can't say that I like the name) . . . This is one of the most misunderstood and misused terms around 3FC, (or in any weight-loss circle) unfotunately. Anyway . . .

It does exist (the YES) . . . if you consistently deprive your body of the nutrients it requires to keep everything functioning, it will begin to conserve what you do give it for fear it is never going to get properly nourished again. For the average woman, a consistent calorie level before 1200 is not recommended because below that level it is difficult to obtain the proper nutrients required for health. However . . . (and this is the NO) . . . notice that I've italicized a certain concept . . . one or two days of a lower level of calories is not going to put you into the infamous "starvation mode". If you are eating below 1200 calories all the time (or almost all the time) -- i.e., consistently, you could very well be harming your metabolism over the long haul. Eventually weight loss will slow down because your body has forced itself to learn to exist on fewer calories.

Additionally, the body can be inconsistent in how it uses energy and weight loss does not occur on a timetable. The body does become complacent sometimes, too. So shaking things up a little in either the calories-in or the calories-out areas can sometimes help. Usually, however, if you are eating at a sensible level, and exercising at a sensible level as well -- one that should be resulting in about a 500 to 1000 calorie deficit per day as compared to a sensible BMR level -- the weight will eventually move.

It may not move as quickly as it does for a non-diabetic, unfortunately, (nore as quickly as we would like it to) but move it will.

Last edited by meowee; 06-13-2007 at 03:40 PM.
meowee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 06:00 PM   #3  
Onward and Downward
 
meowee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,485

S/C/G: 285/215/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

BTW . . . I put your BMR at about 2200 to 2500 calories (depending on activity rate). So, you should be able to lose about 1 pound a week at a calorie level of 1700 minimum.
meowee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 06:05 PM   #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mickey79sf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 178

S/C/G: 229/T/170

Height: 5'7

Default

Thanks Meowee sometimes peaking around the other forums on here i tend to forget that the non-diabetics react a whole lot differently when it comes to weightloss. which is one reason things can get a bit fustrating I just find the whole cal in vs. cal out kinda misleading too, because if u are going by the numbers then hey i should be dropping weight like no bodies business. this is also why i try to avoid the calorie counting stuff & fitday, it puts me in a bad frame of mind and then i start obessing over why
the "formula" isn't working. I've already managed to suck the joy out of my NSV man.. sometimes this stuff sucks.
Mickey79sf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 06:10 PM   #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mickey79sf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: sacramento, CA
Posts: 178

S/C/G: 229/T/170

Height: 5'7

Default

AHHHHH now im really confused. i don't eat like that even on a good day, because i just can't eat that much food and i work out for an hour a nite 6-7 days a week. AND i don't have a car so i walk everywhere!!! and yet i have gone up 1 lbs and can't seem to get that freaking thing off no matter what i do. whats wrong with me?
Quote:
Originally Posted by meowee View Post
BTW . . . I put your BMR at about 2200 to 2500 calories (depending on activity rate). So, you should be able to lose about 1 pound a week at a calorie level of 1700 minimum.
Mickey79sf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 06:12 PM   #6  
Onward and Downward
 
meowee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,485

S/C/G: 285/215/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

Hang in there, girl . . . nobody can promise you "easy" . . . but with a little help from our friends . . . we can manage the disease and the weight loss. Always remember the tortoise . . .
meowee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.