I'm not really sure why you are against people talking to their doctor before starting Atkins. There are risks with almost every WOE, even calorie counters can go about it wrong or find that they have issues. All I was saying, was for the OP to do the research, and check with their doctor before deciding on Atkins.
High protein diet on the American Heart Association was in reference to the many diets listed, and Atkins, on many of it's pages in it's own site, calls itself a "high protein diet" or refers to its own methods as "high protein." Only on one of its pages does it suddenly claim to not be high protein.
http://www.atkins.com/Science/Nutrit...e/Protein.aspx
Many articles label Atkins as a "high protein diet" because that is the group it's generally located in "moderate = high" in comparison to most other diets. I also am pretty sure the American Heart association would do their research and wouldn't be misinforming people, because if Atkins was perfect, they would probably be the biggest supporter if it helped with obesity. They have nothing to gain by telling people the real risks regarding any diet other than that's what they are there for.
Atkins still has been linked by MANY doctors for heart problems. I really wish I had my j-store account for many articles that speak about Atkins risks directly. Instead I'll use other sources for the many complications that Atkins does in fact have. If you want to just dismiss anyone's opinion and instantly label it "misinformation" due to what you perceive as a technicality because you just want Atkins to be perfect, then I find that disheartening considering we are here to help each other and support each other. I'm glad Atkins works for you, and I'm all for telling people your success, but you should really consider allowing people to talk to their doctors and not assuming anyone who's had a bad experience is just "misinformed." There are real risks associated with Atkins, and denying them and attempting to convince others that they don't exist, well that's dangerous. There are risks such as the following:
" High acid diets, such as the Atkins diet, increase the risk of uric acid stones. 42" Source: American Family Pharmacist:
http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/1201/p1234.html
This is in reference to kidney stones, now... to be fair, recent studies (including a 2 year study on around 340 ish patients) tested Atkins and low fat diets directly and no direct link with kidney failure and low carb effected the patients. That is the patients with good kidneys. However, more research is needed to learn more about people with bad kidneys or that are at risk for kidney failure. So far, anyone at risk that follows a low-carb diet has been shown to have kidney stones and other problems. Why is that important? Because only about 26 million Americans have it:
http://www.kidney.org/kidneydisease/aboutckd.
In other words, as I said previously,
talk to your doctor, before starting ANY WOE, and you should probably check your kidneys before doing any low carb diet. If your kidneys are fine, then according to recent studies, Atkins probably won't be causing any kidney issues.
A systematic review of primarily short-term observational studies found that low-carbohydrate diets were no more effective for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate diets, and that weight loss was directly related to the degree of caloric restriction and duration of the diet. http://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0601/p1942.html
In other words, if you find that you have kidney issues, that you can't do low carb, or that your doctor strongly recommends you don't try it, that's fine. There is a VERY good chance you'll be just as successful in the long term with a calorie restrictive diet instead. If your doctor is cool with Atkins and you would prefer Atkins to simple calorie restrictions, then hey, by all means do Atkins. Just know that alternatives are out there if you are struggling or experiencing side effects. That's all I was saying.
The relatively low fiber intake of patients on low-carbohydrate diets raises concerns about constipation and long-term risks of cancer and diverticular disease. Theoretic concerns exist about osteoporosis resulting from increased calciuria and lower intake of magnesium, potassium, and vitamin C.9 Low-carbohydrate diets also raise uric acid levels and may exacerbate gout. Constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, halitosis, headaches, insomnia, kidney stones, and nausea have been reported in persons on low-carbohydrate diets.9,32 http://www.aafp.org/afp/2009/0401/p571.html
This goes back to my side effects while on Atkins. And I noticed in this very forum that headaches were addressed, so it is a very real side effect, and for me, very not worth it. In addition, I experienced constipation and a lot of nausea. These are real side effects. In addition, not everyone will experience them, so I repeat myself........ talk to your doctor especially if you find yourself with these side effects.
In addition, the "low carb monthly" link you posted only talks about enzymes and sugars. I don't think anyone would disagree that a large amount of sugar consumption is a good way to hurt your overall health, not just your heart. The problem with low carb, is you lack in nutrients, a lot of people can't sustain it or quit, most turn to high fats which absolutely have been linked to heart disease.
And the "high stakes" link, I can't believe I just suffered reading something that sources wikipedia and makes pretty far fetched claims like that we "Can't measure our cholesteral" because that's odd... I just had mine measured at my annual check up. Also, American Heart association mentions you should check yours as well: "http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/Cholesterol/AboutCholesterol/What-Your-Cholesterol-Levels-Mean_UCM_305562_Article.jsp.
While that source does touch up on the levels and claims that your measurements are "misleading", and then the author literally sources something that literally reads "Bipity Boppity Boo" I mean... I don't feel I can trust anything on this site. It's like the sites that claim vaccines will give you autism, sound convincing if you have no idea what vaccines really do, but are just horrid misinformation. For one thing: "
Cholesterol levels are measured in milligrams (mg) of cholesterol per deciliter (dl) of blood serum. Based on the results of the Framingham Heart Study and other research, the ideal level appears to be below 150 mg/dl. At that point, coronary artery disease is very unlikely.
Unfortunately, nearly 107 million Americans have cholesterol levels over 200,1 with the average level for coronary artery disease victims being 225.3" http://www.pcrm.org/health/health-to...-heart-disease. So, there you go, it can be measured and that's how, I think this debunks over half this link. The only thing I can attest to on this site is that cholesterol can help with heart disease, it's recommended you get a certain amount, but too much, especially of LDLs... is bad.
I'm not going to touch the last link, no sources are listed, it's clearly a biased site, and it's a blog spot. It also goes on about cholesterol, which I feel I've been pretty over done on.
I just want people to not be misinformed about their diets. I was merely trying to help the OP, and like I said, if you decide Atkins is right for you, then I will cheer you on for EVERY pound you lose. Some people are extremely successful with it, and that is awesome. Some people will NOT have a single side effect, will find themselves in the shape of their lives and will never regret doing Atkins or other low carb diets. Seriously awesome. Other people will find themselves in the hospital, or talking to their doctor about how they can't poop and have a seriously horrid headache and nausea all the time and find out it's their diet. I really hope those people don't just pretend their doctor is misinformed, and instead find a different WOE so they can also lose weight and not suffer the side effects.