Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2011, 10:22 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MrsD2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 624

S/C/G: 265/see ticker/130

Height: 5'0

Default Research on BMI

I hear a lot of people grumble about Body Mass Index. Is there some research the BMI is outdated? And if it is, why is WW still basing final goals on it?

I met my 10% yesterday, so I have been thinking about making my final goal. My doctor said she wouldn't like to see me below 130, but according to BMI, I shouldn't be above 128. When I first started, I really wanted to work toward 125. I was about 118-122 when I was in my first and second years of high school--but I was a lot younger then!

I've lost 23 lbs so far and I am starting a walking regimen this week. I've made a lot of changes in my eating habits and what foods I do reach for. In my head, I have reached my ultimate goal. So why is that 2-5 pounds messing with my head?!
MrsD2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 11:11 PM   #2  
Moderator
 
Heather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,704

S/C/G: 295/225/back to Onederland

Height: 5'5"

Default

Outdated? Try, never designed for how we use it.

BMI wasn't designed for individuals but has been co-opted for them because it's very easy to measure and does have correlates with health outcomes.

If you're interested, here's a decent article about the history and use of BMI: http://www.slate.com/id/2223095/

One excerpt:
"Belgian polymath Adolphe Quetelet devised the equation in 1832 in his quest to define the "normal man" in terms of everything from his average arm strength to the age at which he marries. This project had nothing to do with obesity-related diseases, nor even with obesity itself. Rather, Quetelet used the equation to describe the standard proportions of the human build—the ratio of weight to height in the average adult. Using data collected from several hundred countrymen, he found that weight varied not in direct proportion to height (such that, say, people 10 percent taller than average were 10 percent heavier, too) but in proportion to the square of height. (People 10 percent taller than average tended to be about 21 percent heavier.)"

And later:
"Keys had never intended for the BMI to be used in this way. His original paper warned against using the body mass index for individual diagnoses, since the equation ignores variables like a patient's gender or age, which affect how BMI relates to health. It's one thing to estimate the average percent body fat for large groups with diverse builds, Keys argued, but quite another to slap a number and label on someone without regard for these factors."
Heather is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Metabolic Research Center - Take IV Hvnlymzic Metabolic Research Center 598 09-25-2009 07:01 AM
Metabolic Research Center - Take III hdaisy96 Metabolic Research Center 631 09-28-2007 09:47 AM
Need info on what to expect missmeliss Weight Loss Surgery 18 12-22-2005 06:11 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.