Annie - I got the impression it was done to make a point, not a law. One of the sponsors of the bill even admitted that he might not get served if the bill passed (ie. his BMI might be too high). I suspect it was done in response to a report that called Mississippi the fattest state.
There are so many things they could do, but they do this in response.
1) make gym memberships tax deductible, including time with personal trainers. I'm assuming that like Canada, the states collect taxes, as well as federal taxes. So the states could offer a tax break to those joining a gym.
2) standardize nutrition labelling. I'm looking at a couple of different snack items I have here and one labels for 50g, one for 20g, and one for 14g. For people in the US, 14g is half an ounce. Although that specific product is light it makes comparisons harder. The 50g ones are not sold as diet products (although the pita chips are baked, the tostidos are whole wheat). Most are lower in fat %, but not all. The crispers are the closest in fat content and calories, but I seem to be able to eat just an ounce of them. I can't do the same for the chips. However, for those that can measure out and just eat an ounce, the cost of the
diet foods might not be worth it. I added the information for an ounce of all from my Fitday as an attachment.
3) have restaurants provide nutrition information, for all items, on their menu. Not hidden away on a website, although this should be a minimum requirement. My calorie allotment for the day is up to 2000, so I might choose the 800 cal entree, instead of the 500 calorie grilled chicken plate. Let me decide what I want, not the restaurant by only providing info on 4 or 5 items. As it happens I tend to chose what I want when I eat out, simply removing the potato/chips/starch.
4) fine manufacturers who play with serving sizes so they call call their products fat free, or calorie free. My canola oil spray is 10 cals per second, but I know that some put a serving size as 1/3 of a second so they can put zero cals on the label. It kind on links in with #2, but slightly different.
5) early education on nutrition and cooking, for both genders
6) free visits to nutritionists (in Canada, doctor visits are free, but nutritionists visits are not).
I remember being really annoyed when a friend of mine visited her doctor and he proclaimed her obese. She was about 5 pounds into the obese range (depending which chart you used, some would say she was not). I know it was meant to shock her into doing something, but no real guidance was offered. She was sent home with a mandate to lose at least 30 lbs. Yes, 30 pounds would take her to the high side of an acceptable BMI. This really bugs me, at 150 she was obese, but at 120 she was okay. (She's 4'11", I remember checking it at the time.)
She was borderline broke (working for us as a temp), not really able to afford the nutritionist visit (which wasn't even suggested). Myself and another coworker helped her evaluate what she was eating (it was truly bad - donuts for breakfast, takeout lunch with fries usually, 2-3 cans of pop, and a sandwich and brownies for dinner). We switched her off pop, added some fruits and vegetables, and found her better breakfast and lunch alternatives. She dropped about 10 pounds in a month without changing her exercise level (working in a job that gave her a fair bit anyway). I don't think she ever finished losing the 30 (I left before she got there), but probably ended up losing 25.
Wow, that was too much ranting about a joke bill. From the looks of the three sponsors, I suspect none of them plan to run for re-election. That's probably a good thing.
Ooops - the attachment wasn't readable, so I added it to my Flickr page. You can view it here:
Snack Foods