Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotsgal
I would find that I would always give myself goals and targets and never reach them also, but I think it was because they were always rather far fetched. For example: My friends got married last October and 6 weeks before it I wanted to lose 2lbs a week so that I was 12lbs lighter come the wedding. Me and my friend went on the cabbage soup diet, we did the exact same things and in 7 days she lost 7lbs, and I put on 2
. I was going to the gym 5 times a week and really burning everything off (I thought). In the 6 weeks, I lost 6lbs
it was half of what I aimed for and I felt huge! But in reality I had gained a lot of muscle.
Now I lose like mentioned before just 1lb a week, sometimes I don't reach it, But some weeks I lose more than that and it catches up.
I like visually seeing the loss, because after 32lbs I still don't see it on my body yet.
Oh, been there so many times! If I didn't lose a kilo a week, I thought I'm doing it all wrong

I even made complete charts detailing what event I'll be at which weight - believing I can keep losing 1kg/week for at least 20, preferably 25 weeks

My scale doesn't help things - +-1 kilo at the best of times, it's hard to tell the difference even if you're really trying, like stepping on it the same way every time, trying to guess the right angle...

I always lost quite fast the first month or two even at a quite high intake for whatever reason (last time it was about 2000 cal) but then it stalled and I might have lost half a kilo in two, three weeks (or not. My scale is a moody old lady, as previously said, and it's better not to trust her completely), I would get discouraged and a) lower my calories until I'd start feeling bad b) conclude it's not worth it. This time it will be different, I swear
This time my plan of attack is a bit more sophisticated. I previously counted my calories at a local version of "myfitnesspall" (it looks similar enough), but found that I had trouble devising meals, keeping my fridge and pantry stocked, I would sometimes sneak a big treat and not eat enough for the rest of the day, it allowed me to be fairly erratic with meal planning etc.
So after estimating my intake at 1800cal with 35% fat, 20% protein and 45% carbs, I divided these numbers between breakfast, lunch and dinner. The protein and fat is the same for all, but the carbs are sliding down through the day. Then I calculated several options for each meal (sometimes even with sub-options - do I want three apples or some juice

), so they are easily interchangeable. If I want something different, it's also easier to calculate it to fit a single meal rather than the whole day. And if I like it, I record it, so my meal options are getting larger. The big advantage is that it can be really effortless if I don't have a lot of time, while being flexible enough so I don't feel too constricted. It's actually easier than regular meal planning. The downside is that it's harder to fit in any potential irregularity because there's less of a "buffer zone" due to calories per meal being a tighter measure than calories per day. Lately I was a little slack about the macros, I often forgo my carby side for things like extra cheese or some fruit, but as long as I'm not reducing protein or it isn't getting too out of hand, I think I'm good.
I'm a little baffled at how can I lose at this intake, though. I wasn't exercising nearly as much as my calculations included. Will change beginning today, though. It's the first month, sure, so I shouldn't be too concerned, but... well... it could look like there's a flaw somewhere in the calculations. And it also begs the question what in the name of God was I eating to gain the weight in the first place, but, ah well. I guess it's just the first month with the water weight and all