View Single Post
Old 01-09-2005, 08:37 AM   #8
silverbirch
in development
 
silverbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wales, Britain
Posts: 2,822

Height: 5' 6"

Default

Just a brief post here as deadlines are looming. (What? On a Sunday? Don’t ask.)

Thanks, Meg, for taking the time to go to the lecture and to put together such a coherent summary for us. Very interesting knowledge, as my little sister would have said at age 9. But there’s something in there about terminology which I’d like to get clear so people don’t make the wrong assumptions.

Scientists and medics use a scale of different categories for people’s weight. It’s something like: underweight, normal, overweight, obese, morbidly obese. These categories have precise meanings and aren’t just normal language (where obese = very fat). Now Leibel’s work has been done with obese and reduced obese people, hasn’t it? So, the findings may not be true at all for ‘overweight’ people and it may not even be possible to say that they are just ‘a bit less true’ for overweight people. And not all of us maintainers (and lurkers) are reduced obese; some of us (like me) are in the category of reduced/reducing overweight (to coin a phrase).

Splitting hairs? Perhaps, but I think it’s worth pointing out.
__________________
Silverbirch

Last edited by silverbirch : 01-09-2005 at 09:36 AM. Reason: to add emphasis
silverbirch is offline   Reply With Quote