Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2010, 12:59 PM   #31  
Senior Member
 
Sonata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Calfornia
Posts: 173

S/C/G: 364/ticker/199

Height: 5'11"

Default

I just don't worry about the calories. My goal is to get my heart rate into the target zone and hold it there for 30 minutes. The calories are an extra bonus.
Sonata is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 11:33 PM   #32  
Fattie for the Win!
 
MagdalenaRaela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 24

S/C/G: 270/232/140

Height: 5'4"

Default

This is definitely good to know. The elliptical I use asks for my age and weight and monitors my HR, so I think it's at least in the ballpark of how many calories I'm burning.

But this thread has peaked my interest and now I'm interested in getting a heart monitor to show me how many calories I am actually burning. Because, for me, the number of calories is important in keeping my calculations accurate.
MagdalenaRaela is offline  
Old 09-30-2011, 09:53 AM   #33  
Senior Member
 
lissvarna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 119

S/C/G: 168/148/135

Height: 5'8"

Default

I enter my weight 15lbs lower than it is, and then I subtract about 10% of those calories off- I figure that's a fairly accurate reading.
lissvarna is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 04:42 PM   #34  
Junior Member
 
jttw18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26

Default

When I began using the machines, I would always look at the calorie counter. A little over a month ago, I started putting my towel over the monitor so I can't see it anymore.

I base my exercise off how I feel and the intensity of the workout. That gives me a more accurate feeling and point of where my body is physically pushing itself.
jttw18 is offline  
Old 07-08-2012, 07:12 AM   #35  
Member
 
BlackBarbieKiss125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 58

S/C/G: 257/160/135

Height: 5'5

Default

I always assume less or enter a lower weight so it shows less. Like say for example the machine says I burned 500, I assume 250.

Or I enter a weight of 50 lbs less than I am now and assume.

The machines are highly inaccurate, when I was really into counting everything it just lead to a disappointment.
BlackBarbieKiss125 is offline  
Old 07-11-2012, 01:02 PM   #36  
Trying.....
 
brvsfan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: N Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 70

S/C/G: 248/ticker/175

Height: 5'9

Default

I wear a heart rate monitor/calorie counter with a chest strap when I work out. The calories it says I burn are NEVER the same as what the machine says . Sometimes the machine is high and sometimes it is low. The monitor is more accurate because you input more personal information in to it.
brvsfan99 is offline  
Old 10-17-2012, 04:40 AM   #37  
Member
 
Psyence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 42

S/C/G: 13.3/12.10/9

Height: 5'4"

Default

I've always wondered about those calorie counters :/ I generally don't trust them as they always seem to say I've lost far too many calories from just a halfhour workout!
Psyence is offline  
Old 11-15-2012, 08:20 AM   #38  
Carbivore
 
MadProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 69

S/C/G: 260/167/172

Height: 6' 2"

Default

Calories counters, as well as "non-scientifical-grade" fat percentage meters are highly inacurate, and basing on their readings in order to keep track of energy balance is a waste of time. The most accurate, widely accessible tool for people doing gym is the pulsometer. Maintaining a certain HR during a certain time is a valuable information, useful for planning workouts and other forms of activity.
MadProfessor is offline  
Old 12-10-2012, 06:10 PM   #39  
Member
 
Jentry07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 40

Default

I've heard they're not exactly accurate either, especially if you don't even enter your weight, height, age, sex or anything of that matter! Everyone is so different it'd be hard for them to know exactly, I would use it as a gauge if you do enter your own information that is, but I wouldn't trust it enough to judge your consuming of calories strictly off that!
Jentry07 is offline  
Old 10-14-2014, 11:57 AM   #40  
Jiggle, BE GONE WITH YOU!
 
dietcokehead98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 806

S/C/G: 256/185/170

Height: 5'6

Default

I use http://www.healthstatus.com/calculate/cbc

Most machines don't even ask for my weight and I don't like that. I'm sure I'm burning more calories at 218 than someone who is 125.
dietcokehead98 is offline  
Old 03-03-2015, 03:06 PM   #41  
Junior Member
 
Danni_peck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 13

Default

I really don't trust them. I mean, there's no way I could burn almost 350 calories in 30 minutes of exercise.It seems too easy for me.
Danni_peck is offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.