Hi, Turtles,
Erin, it's good to hear from you. I've been wondering how you were doing. Don't get discouraged. It will take time for your body to adjust to not being starved. I'm so proud of you for doing this, hard as it is. You're doing great!
Kathy, I don't count carrot or onion points. I did just fine on 123 Success and I mostly follow that plan. I use the Winning Points for the activity points slider, because I think, used properly, it more accurately reflects the points we use. And I use WP for the information in the booklets. It's much more useful than the booklets in 123 Success.
Looking forward to seeing your quilts.

I love doing projects like that, but don't because I don't have time right now.
Lauren--Woo Hoo!! Let's cheer. Another 2# gone. Great job!
My earliest memory of worrying about eating something was at around age 6 or 7. But I didn't get put on diets until I was 9 or so. I still resent that because my pictures show that I wasn't actually fat. I just didn't fit in "normal" clothes. I still don't because I'm not proportioned the same way as the "ideal" the designers make clothing for. Long torso and short legs in an era where short torsos and long legs are "in". I hate that we even HAVE "in" and "out" in terms of genetic things we have no control over.

That's an old rant. I'll leave it at that.
Lauren, it's the high glycemic quality of flour and potatoes they're referring to when they put them on the 'bad' list. Carrots and onions go on that list, too, which is why WW started counting them.
I had some other issues with that article, Lauren. One problem I had is partly with semantics. People persist in saying "carbs" when they mean "refined carbs", which gives the impression that all carbohydrates are in this category. The problem, IMHO, isn't with "low fat, high carb" per se. It's that the response of the food industry has been to produce products very high in sugars and refined flour as the "carbs" we should eat instead of all that fat. Our bodies didn't evolve eating processed food.
A second problem I had is that it doesn't discuss vegetarianism. Vegetarians are a group who have less heart disease and they certainly don't follow Atkins-style recommendations.
The last problem I had is that early on in the article the author states that Dr. Atkins goes too far in eliminating carbs. Then proceeds to use his diet as the benchmark, even after he said it wasn't the best way to do a "high fat, low carb" plan.
I think the most telling statement in the whole piece is when he said that this is such a complex physiological process that we really don't understand how it works. That's so true, yet we still keep prescribing "things" for people to do that will make them thin. We're guessing and we're using ourselves as guinea pigs. I wonder if, in the end, they're going to decide that people simply come in all shapes and sizes. (Not that such a conclusion will cause anyone to simply accept human diversity. They'll still try to make everyone measure up to the current standard, whatever that may be.)
Regarding what to do with all of this information. Well, for my health, I'm working to up the calcium. Osteoporosis runs rampant in my family.
I'm also working to up my fat a little. I've been tracking my fat grams, just to see what percentage I've been eating at and it's way too low, which may be why I've been having trouble sticking with my range. I remember that on the first WW program, way back when two slices of bread or the equivalent was all the starchy food we were allowed each day, I was less hungry than on any plan except the fat and fiber one.
Well, in comparing the two plans, the fiber fills you up, which makes up for not eating 8-10 ounces of animal protein. They didn't have a vegetarian plan back then and they actually limited high fiber foods like beans, so you got your satiety from the fat in that animal protein. I remember eating something like three or four small pieces of chicken to get the minimum amount I was supposed to eat at dinner.
ICK! I really hated eating that way, which is why I didn't stick it out. I was't all that fat, either. A good exercise program is what I needed at that time. The ten or so pounds would have dropped off if I had spent the money I spent on WW on dance classes!!
As I've worked with the point system, and with my past experiences with different food plans, I've discovered that eating enough fiber, enough fat, enough protein, enough fruits and vegetables, and enough dairy is what works best. So, I'm right with you, Lauren, re: moderation. But I'd also add balance to the equation.
I don't believe that cutting out any food group or type of food is a magic key to losing weight. Nor do I believe it's healthy. People like Atkins-type plans because they can (theoretically) eat as much as they want. Well, it didn't work well for me and I hated it, besides. I'm not willing to give up my favorite foods to lose weight. But you all know that.
I'm still OP. Thanks for starting that challenge, Lauren. I needed a kick to get me going. I walked for an hour yesterday and I will be walking again today because I need to pick up some bread.
It's my 25th anniversary today. We're going to walk to the Olive Garden for dinner. I have a ton of banked points and I intend to eat what I want, but I won't eat all of it. Their portions are too huge! But, I did wish we could have afforded to throw a party. (My dh doesn't. He hates parties.) But our son's education is much more important, so that's where our money went.
My class is working me hard. Applying these concepts to my writing is not easy, but I can see that it's worthwhile. So, I'm working hard, meeting my dare challenges and getting a handle on this story so the book comes closer to what's in my head, which has been one major frustration I've had as a writer.
Happy turtlin'!
Lin
(272/251/242/ final-

)