Weight Loss Surgery If you've had it, or are considering it, share your discussions here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2005, 09:17 PM   #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
ThatbabyMadeMeFat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16

Talking Scientific-al Sorta Type-y Question

I have not had WLS. I don't qualify, even though I am as big as a house. But anyway...

You know how "they" (You know, those "they" people.. and magazines, and doctors, and junk) say that people shouldn't go below 1200-1400 calories a day because it fries your metabolism and your body goes into starvation mode? Well, most of the girlies I know who have had WLS eat well below that caloric amount each day and lose weight. A lot of weight. Yes, it slows down after a six or eight month period a bit but until then, they can lose up to 7 pounds a week. Whyyyyyyyyy? If non-WLS people can ruin their metabolisms by not eating "enough" calories why doesn't that happen to WLS people? Me no understand it. Does it have to do with the fact that most post-op'ers eat many tiny meals a day so that keeps the metabolism up? Any thoughts welcome.
ThatbabyMadeMeFat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2005, 12:17 AM   #2  
Senior Member
 
original_serendipity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 165

S/C/G: 329/180/150

Height: 5'4"

Default

Once a person has weight loss surgery, at least the type I had, the metabolism complately changes. Ergo, the rules change. The relationship between the pancreas and small intestine is so dramatically different, that the body doesn't recognize 500 calories a day as starvation mode. The brain also sees the relationship change, so hunger signals typically change as well. The pancreas puts out less insulin and the blood sugar levels stay stable longer, forcing the body to burn stored fat as long as there is adequate protein being ingested. So, don't make the mistake of thinkng of those of us who have had surgery as starving ourselves. We aren't. We are doing what our "new anatomies" need. Our bodies will eventually adapt to certain aspects of the malabsorption aspects in abywhere from 2 to 10 years time. It's so individualistic. Each person's results, side effects and complications are as individual as their fingerprints.


Angie
original_serendipity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2005, 03:11 PM   #3  
Senior Member
 
funniegrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,123

Default

Even for us non-WLS people, the 1200-1400 rule isn't about metabolism, it's about nutrients. It takes at least 1200 calories of a well-balanced diet to provide an adult with the bare minimum RDAs of vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients. Taking vitamin pills obviously help avoid that problem, but the "metabolism" threshold isn't really related. I can eat 3000 calories per day, but if that is significantly lower than than what my body needs (due to body composition and activity), starvation mode will still kick in. It happens to people on weight loss programs all the time. They are eating a lot more than 1200 calories and losing. Then they start a vigorous exercise program and their active caloric needs increase a great deal, but they don't eat any more. Sooner or later their body puts on the brakes and they stop losing. So, the point at which your body shifts into survival/starvation mode is individual, and can change drastically over time.
funniegrrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.