Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
to veggie lover:
i think you are a little confused on the point of the film and also what he was attempting to accomplish by eating mc donalds. if you pay attention in the beginning of the movie he explains why he chooses to eat it for breakfast luch and dinner.
it was because, according to the courts, in the case of the people who were suing mcdonalds (which also explains why he chose mcdonalds to begin with) that mc donalds could be held liable in thier case if it could be proven that eating thier foods for 3 meals a day on a daily basis could be shown to be harmful. which it obviously was shown to be quite harmful.
|
In the lastest article of the New York Times Under Health and Science, clearly McDOnald's is no longer liable for anything. They do not have to implement the fact that their food is harmful. Obviously YOU DON'T get my gist; I'm not defending McDOnalds. I simply see no use in this movie pertaining to myself. Why? (Like I said, this is MY TAKE AND NO ONE ELSES? How many times do I have to repeat this???) Because i'M WAS NEVER AN IDIOT ENOUGH TO EAT IT 3 TIMES A DAY. As for the girls who sued, the courts dismissed it completely. SO there goes his liability- he's simply finding a fast food chain to pick on. I'm not supporting McDOnalds, but I wouldn't support the movie either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
the experiment that he was doing was not to resist mcdonalds, but to eat it consistently, and to biggie size only if he was asked to. i think the point that he was making is that if the food was healthy you could eat it three meals a day every day and suffer no consequences. and that if it causes a person such bad health effects in just one short month, think what it does to your body over a lifetime.
|
WHose choice was it? Again, you seem to support the fact that the average consumer is a pretty dumb ambivalent choice maker. "SUper size it , sir?" "Why of course! He didn't warn me about the calories, so its okay! I don't ever need to check by myself!"
Look, Meeegun, read everyone else's beside mine. I'm not the only one who emphasizes choice; I'm a smart consumer. Even when I was in elementary school, I even told my friends about the nutrient values in french bread pizza. I know he brings attention the school cafeterias, but what was that going to do? Only educate the people who didn't know anythign about it before. Great, good for those who don't bother to check what their kids are eating. Look at User LLV (LInda) 's kid- she even taught him SUGAR CONTENT. He's 6 years old and he knows how much sugar he's supposed to be getting. How would I ever thank this movie if it never pertained to me? I'm simply arguing that it didn't serve a purpose for those who obviously did their hw. For those who didnt, it's a culture jargon to say "shock value" because it delivers an unexpected yet cheap take on something the audience didn't know- and the audience who obviously thought this movie was a "heads up" are the ones who didn't bother researching before. We all start at some point, but many of us aren't "sure, supersize it since you offered" people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
you seem pretty perturbed over his seeming lack of good "Choices" by eating the "unhealthy" items on the menu. but in reality, as part of his experiment he required himself to eat everything on the menu at least once. therefore, he HAD to eat all of the items, even the really bad ones. so he did make choices from the menu, but he also had to adhere to the rules of the experiment. besides, i find it doubtful that there are enough low fat and low calorie items on the menu that one could realistically eat "healthy" at mc donalds for every meal anyways.
|
Again, do average joes require themselves to eat everything on the menu at least once? Maybe some, but definitely not the majority! Does the target audience feel the need to experiment? There are no rules when it comes to your own diet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
furthermore, many of those low fat items only came about after the litigation. before the law suit, they didn`t give out pedometers with thier "adult" happy meals, or have nearly as many salads. also, i think you are missing a point here too: there ARE people out there who DO eat fast food 3 meals a day. and yes, i fully agree that life is about choices, and that your food is no different. but the movie did have merit and there was definitely a point to it other than trashing mcdonalds.
|
McD's wanted their target consumers back if they were, at all convinced by the movie. The movie had merit ONLY for those that turned heads. DOes it take a man eating 3 meals a day at a fast food joint and seeing the negative consequences of his actions stimulate any motivation from ME (me me me me me this was originally MY opinion about the movie and I have no idea why you are attacking my opinion) ? What a joke. I was never one of those it might even APPLY to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
also, you need to consider that these companies are peddling that crap at schools to our children, and look at what its doing to them: they are overweight, they have vitamin deficiencies, and diabetes is rising. i dunno if you have ever seen anyone who has just had thier leg amputated above the knee from poorly controlled diabetes, but i have, and i wouldn`t wish that on anyone.
|
Blaming health hazards on other people/companies other than yourself is justifiable but comes with a condition; you were abolutely helpless in the situation. Like ASBESTOS poisoning in a rented apartment. So I take it you think vitamin dificiencies, diabetes and weight couldn't in any way, be prevented by the individuals? No? parents couldn't give children food? For those who couldnt afford to pack lunches, they couldn't even tell their kids? People couldn't prevent weight gain by exercise and proper dieting themselves? SOMEONE GET ME A LAWYER! There must be someone else to blame besides me!
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
and, i don`t understand why you are defending mc donalds so much when it is apparent even before the movie came out that the food served there is by and large BAD for you. even thier fruit parfaits are loaded with huge amounts of calories and sugars. and yes, there are other chains that serve food that is equally as dispicable, however, mc donalds is the largest, best known, at the time was embroiled in publicity over a law suit, and for his sake in purely practical terms, the most abundant in manhattan where he lived.
|
I sound like I'm defending McDOnalds only because I'm not for the movie. I said McD's wasn;t my enemy, not that they were my best friend. The fruit parfaits? I always get the tiny one, and even then, whose responsibility is it to check the grams of sugar, if youre so concerned? Seems to me you like defending the action of blaming someone else....
I live in NYC. I don't think the quantity of chains ever made me eat their more often.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
furthermore, the movie didn`t miscontstrue fact. for instance, he was fully evaluated before he began the experiment and found to be a completely healthy person. at the end, he was tired all the time, depressed, overweight, his liver was having significant issues as were other organs. i think we can all agree that anything that makes us feel that crappy is probably something we should avoid.
|
I never refuted that part. And uh... I knew what crappy food was before the movie... so thats how I avoided McD's. I think the average person had the same capability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
also, another important point of the film was to point out how little education is available by the establishment in regards to what exactly is IN the food. in the film, he visits every mc donalds in manhattan ( i think there were close to 100 stores) and only a handful had a wall chart displaying nutrition info and even less had a take home pamphlet. if the food was good for you, wouldn`t a company prefer to use that as a selling point? instead, mcdonalds sweeps it under the mat. does it give you the feeling that they don`t WANT you to know?? it does to me.
|
"where's the fine print? The calorie info? Oh you don't have it? That's okay, I'll take it anyway!" It's called marketing. Wanna know how people overcome advertisements? They do their research. Yes... what it means to be the true educated consumer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeegun
i think considering that we are all here because we have had one too many big macs ourselves in our lifetimes .......i am glad he chose to put himself through all of that to show the american public just what eating those foods does to your body. and if mcdonalds feels slighted in the process, well, maybe they better get busy searching for thier jared...after 50 some years there should be SOMEONE out there who has lost weight eating at mc donalds, right??
|
Good for you, you're glad. I'm STILL not impressed by the movie. Again, I think you picked out some very slim ideas from my critique and you mashed it into somehing else. I won't argue against what anyone said. Each statement is only suppose to represent MY opinion. I'm not the only one who feels this way. You must realize that the movie came out during a diet hype era, when south beach and atkins was exploding again. That's marketing too, isn't it? That's selling an idea, is it not? The way I see it, McDOnald's hides their info and some people don't bother to check. They see this movie and they're like "OH MY GOD. I JUST HAD AN EPIPHANY. FAST FOOD=BAD. NATION IS FAT." COngrats to those who needed this movie for that extra little tad of motivation. Unfortunately for some of us, we learned nothing knew, and we took away nothing, because it never applied to us to begin with.