Quote:
Originally Posted by pimpishboo
say you're having a hard time taking in the recommended amount of calories during the day, which is better?
1) trying to force yourself to eat despite your not being hungry
2) just ignoring it
|
If I'm not hungry, I don't worry about it. The only meal I 'force' myself to eat is breakfast, since eating breakfast gets your body's metabolism and other things going again after not eating all night. It's been said many times that eating breakfast, as long as you eat lowfat (meaning you don't have fried eggs, hash browns, bacon, etc.) helps you to lose weight. I believe this because I didn't really start losing weight until I started eating breakfast. So I eat breakfast every day whether I'm hungry or not. When I have mornings where I really don't feel like eating anything at all, I have a Slimfast or some other type of nutrition shake just to get something in me. But I sincerely believe in the 'theory' that eating breakfast helps you lose weight easier and faster because it only makes sense. When you eat in the morning, it gets your metabolism kicked in and you burn more fat during the day. That and if you skip breakfast, you're more likely to overeat at lunch because by then you're literally famished.
As far as the starvation mode theory goes, I don't really believe in that either. Yes, your body tries to hold onto nutrients when it realizes it's not getting enough, but this isn't going to inhibit actual weight loss. If you starve yourself, if you don't eat enough calories, you're gonna lose weight, plain and simple. However, this is just my personal opinion. When I go under my calories for a couple of days or so, I drop weight faster than if I stay at my alotted calorie range for losing 1-2 pounds a week. However, I don't go under my calories very often and the reason has nothing to do with "starvation mode" theories, but because I want to lose weight safely.
|